{"id":12702,"date":"2022-10-04T09:29:00","date_gmt":"2022-10-04T13:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/?p=12702"},"modified":"2022-10-04T12:07:46","modified_gmt":"2022-10-04T16:07:46","slug":"farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/","title":{"rendered":"Farmer Sentiment Drifts Lower, Rising Interest Rates Contribute to Uneasiness"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <em>Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer <\/em>index drifted lower to a reading of 112 in September which was 5 points lower than a month earlier. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n<!--noteaser-->\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>James Mintert and Michael Langemeier, Purdue Center for Commercial Agriculture<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>A breakdown on the Purdue\/CME Group <em>Ag Economy Barometer <\/em>September results can be viewed at <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/j3P8MZ_qJpo\">https:\/\/purdue.ag\/barometervideo.<\/a> Find the audio podcast discussion for insight on this month&#8217;s sentiment at <a href=\"https:\/\/pucommercialag.podbean.com?p=19773673&amp;token=9de4984423aa8a9bcb8aab6c390faf5e\">https:\/\/purdue.ag\/agcast.<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-right wp-block-paragraph\"><em><a href=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/September-2022-Ag-Economy-Barometer_Final.pdf\">Download report (pdf)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The&nbsp;<em>Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer<\/em>&nbsp;index drifted lower to a reading of 112 in September which was 5 points lower than a month earlier. The decline in farmer sentiment was primarily the result of producers\u2019 weaker perception of current conditions as the&nbsp;<em>Current Conditions Index<\/em>&nbsp;declined to 109, 9 points lower than in August. The&nbsp;<em>Index of Future Expectations<\/em>&nbsp;also weakened slightly, declining 3 points from a month earlier to a reading of 113. Compared to a year earlier, the barometer this month was 10% lower while producers\u2019 assessment of current conditions was down 22%. These results stand in contrast with future expectations in September which was only 2% weaker than a year ago. The&nbsp;<em>Purdue University-CME Group&nbsp;Ag Economy Barometer<\/em>&nbsp;sentiment index is calculated each month from 400 U.S. agricultural producers\u2019 responses to a telephone survey. This month\u2019s survey was conducted from September 19-23, 2022, a week or more following USDA\u2019s September&nbsp;<em>Crop Production<\/em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates&nbsp;<\/em>(WASDE).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"attachment_12704\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12704\" class=\"wp-image-12704 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12704\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 1.<\/strong> Purdue\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer, October 2015-September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"attachment_12705\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12705\" class=\"wp-image-12705 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure2.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure2-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure2-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12705\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 2.<\/strong> Indices of Current Conditions and Future Expectations, October 2015-September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Higher input costs are still the number one concern among survey respondents with the shift in U.S. monetary policy rising to the forefront as an issue among U.S. producers. This month 44% of respondents chose \u201chigher input costs\u201d as their number one concern, down from 53% last month. Second on the list of producers\u2019 concerns for the upcoming year was \u201crising interest rates\u201d, chosen by 23% of respondents, up from 14% in August. Third on the list of concerns was \u201cavailability of inputs\u201d chosen by 14% of producers in the survey. The percentage of producers with concerns about input availability has been relatively stable over the last 3 months, ranging from a low of 12% to a high of 15% suggesting this issue is not going away. Interestingly, the percentage of producers choosing \u201clower crop and\/or livestock prices\u201d as one of their biggest concerns declined over the summer. In July 19% of respondents chose it as one of their biggest concerns while just 8% of producers chose it in this month\u2019s survey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This month\u2019s&nbsp;<em>Farm Financial Performance Index<\/em>&nbsp;was unchanged from a month earlier at 99 but was still 10% lower than a year earlier. Compared to earlier this year, producers clearly feel better about their farm\u2019s financial performance. Back in May, 38% of respondents said they expected their farm\u2019s financial performance in 2022 to be worse than in 2021. This month that percentage declined to 29% while the percentage expecting better performance rose from 19% in May to 28% this month. Uncertainty surrounding input costs and availability was partly responsible for the negative perspective held last spring by many producers. As the year unfolded, however, producers\u2019 worst fears regarding input cost rises and poor input availability did not materialize providing much more certainty to their farm\u2019s financial outlook and contributing to their improved perspective on farm financial performance.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"attachment_12706\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12706\" class=\"wp-image-12706 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure3.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure3-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure3-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12706\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 3.<\/strong> Farm Financial Performance Index, April 2018-September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The&nbsp;<em>Farm Capital Investment Index<\/em>&nbsp;declined to a record low of 31 in September as producers continue to indicate that they do not view this as a \u201cgood time\u201d to make large investments in their farming operations. Despite that negative perspective, the percentage of producers who plan to reduce their farm machinery purchases declined again this month, down 2 points compared to responses in August. Since peaking in March at 62 percent, the share of producers who plan to reduce their machinery purchases compared to a year earlier has been declining, dipping to 47% this month. Producers\u2019 plans for farm building purchases tell a similar story, declining from a high of 68% who planned to reduce their building and grain bin purchases back in March to 56% who felt that way in the September survey. Once again, a follow-up question was posed to farmers who reported this being a \u201cbad time\u201d to make large investments to learn why they felt that way. For the third month in a row, producers overwhelmingly said it was primarily because of the increase in prices for farm machinery and new construction. However, interest rates are starting to become a factor influencing producers\u2019 decision making. Throughout the summer the percentage of farmers who chose \u201crising interest rates\u201d as a primary reason for thinking it\u2019s a bad time to make large investments rose from 14% in August to 21% in September.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fewer producers this month said they expect either no change in crop input prices or expect input prices to decline in 2023 compared to 2022 than in recent surveys, while more producers expect an input price rise that matches up more closely with the rate of inflation. In April, 18% of respondents expected input prices in 2023 to decline, whereas this month just one out of ten producers said they look for prices to fall up to 10% below 2022\u2019s level. Over the same time frame, the percentage expecting no change in prices for 2023 declined from 28% to 19%. The largest share (38%) of producers this month expect input prices to rise from 1 up to 9%, compared to 18% who felt that way in April. And nearly a fourth of producers this month said they expect input prices to rise from 10 up to 19%, compared to just 15% of producers who expected input prices to rise that much back in April. Interestingly, in April one out of five producers looked for 2023 input prices to rise by 20% or more whereas in September, just 9% of survey respondents said they expect an input price rise of that magnitude.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Producers\u2019 perspective on farmland values continues to soften. This month the&nbsp;<em>Short-Term Farmland Value Expectations Index<\/em>&nbsp;fell 5 points to 123 while the long-term index fell 7 points to 139. A year ago, the short-term index, which provides producers\u2019 perspective one year into the future, stood at 155. This month\u2019s reading leaves the index 21% lower than a year earlier while the long-term index has fallen 12% over the same time frame. In a follow-up question posed to respondents who expect farmland values to rise over the next 5 years, over 60% of respondents said that the main reason they expect values to rise is non-farm investor demand, up from 45 to 51% who thought that was the main driver back in January and February. At the same time, fewer respondents on this month\u2019s survey said they expect low interest rates to support farmland values than in the past. In January and February, 6 to 9% of respondents who said they expect values to rise cited \u201clow interest rates\u201d as the main reason. In the September survey, just 1% of respondents pointed to low interest rates as the principal reason they expect farmland values to rise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This month\u2019s survey included a series of questions about cover crop usage as a follow-up to the same questions posed in 2021. Nearly six out of 10 (57%) of respondents said they currently plant cover crops on a portion of their farmland while approximately one out of four producers said they have never planted a cover crop. Most producers who report planting cover crops say they only do so on a portion of their farmland. Half of the farmers in this month\u2019s survey who plant cover crops said they do so on 25% or less of their cropland. Nearly a fourth of respondents said they plant cover crops on over 50% of their farms\u2019 acreage. A large share (40%) of producers who reported planting cover crops this month said they have been planting cover crops for 5 years or less. On the other end of the spectrum, 28% of respondents said they have been planting cover crops for more than 10 years. Reasons cited by producers for planting cover crops are varied, but \u201cimprove soil health\u201d at 37% of respondents and \u201cimprove erosion control\u201d at 33% of respondents were the top two reasons cited by cover crop users. Just 5% of cover crop users indicated \u201ccarbon sequestration\u201d was a motivation for planting cover crops.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"attachment_12707\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12707\" class=\"wp-image-12707 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure4.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 4. Farm Capital Investment Index, October 2015-August 2022.\" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure4.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure4-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure4-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12707\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 4.<\/strong> Farm Capital Investment Index, October 2015-September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"attachment_12708\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12708\" class=\"wp-image-12708 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure5.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure5.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure5-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure5-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12708\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 5.<\/strong> Why is Now a Bad Time to Make Large Investments?, September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"attachment_12709\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12709\" class=\"wp-image-12709 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure6.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 6. Plans for Farm Machinery Purchases in the Upcoming Year Compared to a Year Ago, March 2020-September 2022.\" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure6.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure6-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure6-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12709\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 6.<\/strong> Plans for Farm Machinery Purchases in the Upcoming Year Compared to a Year Ago, March 2020-September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"attachment_12710\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12710\" class=\"wp-image-12710 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure7.jpg\" alt=\" &nbsp;Figure 7. Plans for Constructing New Farm Buildings and Grain Bins, May 2021-August 2022. Plans for Constructing New Farm Buildings and Grain Bins, May 2021-September 2022.\" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure7.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure7-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure7-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12710\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong> &nbsp;Figure 7.<\/strong> Plans for Constructing New Farm Buildings and Grain Bins, May 2021-August 2022. Plans for Constructing New Farm Buildings and Grain Bins, May 2021-September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_12711\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12711\" class=\"wp-image-12711 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure9.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 8.&nbsp;How many years have you planted cover crops? \" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure9.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure9-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure9-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12711\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 8.<\/strong>&nbsp;How many years have you planted cover crops? September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"attachment_12712\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12712\" class=\"wp-image-12712 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure10.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 9. Annually what proportion of your farm did you plant to cover crops? \" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure10.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure10-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure10-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12712\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 9.<\/strong> Annually what proportion of your farm did you plant to cover crops? September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"attachment_12713\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12713\" class=\"wp-image-12713 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure8.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 10. Looking ahead to crops that will be planted in 2023, what change do you expect for 2023 crop input prices compared to prices paid for 2022 crop inputs? \" width=\"960\" height=\"696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure8.jpg 960w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure8-300x218.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure8-768x557.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-12713\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 10.<\/strong> Looking ahead to crops that will be planted in 2023, what change do you expect for 2023 crop input prices compared to prices paid for 2022 crop inputs? September 2022.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Wrapping Up<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Farmer sentiment drifted lower in September as the&nbsp;<em>Ag Economy Barometer<\/em>&nbsp;declined 5 points to 112. Weaker sentiment regarding current conditions was the primary driver of this month\u2019s decline in the barometer. Input cost rises are a key factor behind the relative weakness in farmer sentiment. Producers are also becoming increasingly worried about the impact of rising interest rates on their farm operations with more of them citing it as a reason why they think now is not a good time to make large investments. Farmers\u2019 perspective on farmland values showed further signs of softening this month as both the short and long-term farmland value indices declined. Farmers\u2019 usage of cover crops appears to be increasing with 57% of respondents reporting that they use cover crops on at least some of their farmland. Most cover crop users employ cover crops on just a portion of their acreage, with improving soil health and improving erosion control cited as the two most common motivations for planting cover crops, while very few cover crop users said they plant cover crops primarily to sequester carbon.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\u00a0index drifted lower to a reading of 112 in September which was 5 points lower than a month earlier. The decline in farmer sentiment was primarily the result of producers\u2019 weaker perception of current conditions as the\u00a0Current Conditions Index\u00a0declined to 109, 9 points lower than in August.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":12704,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-report"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ag Economy Barometer: May 2022 - Purdue University\/CME Group<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Farmer sentiment improved in August as the\u00a0Purdue-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\u00a0index rose 14 points above its July reading to 117. The rise in the overall measure of agricultural producer sentiment was driven by increases in both the\u00a0Index of Current Conditions, which rose 9 points in August to 118 and the\u00a0Index of Future Expectations, which climbed 16 points in August to 116.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ag Economy Barometer: May 2022 - Purdue University\/CME Group\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Farmer sentiment improved in August as the\u00a0Purdue-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\u00a0index rose 14 points above its July reading to 117. The rise in the overall measure of agricultural producer sentiment was driven by increases in both the\u00a0Index of Current Conditions, which rose 9 points in August to 118 and the\u00a0Index of Future Expectations, which climbed 16 points in August to 116.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ag Economy Barometer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/purdueagribusiness\/?fref=ts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-04T13:29:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-10-04T16:07:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"960\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"696\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Anna Aarstad\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@PUCommercialAg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@PUCommercialAg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Anna Aarstad\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Anna Aarstad\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/51da839c7d5454dec652fcf9020ed408\"},\"headline\":\"Farmer Sentiment Drifts Lower, Rising Interest Rates Contribute to Uneasiness\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-04T13:29:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-10-04T16:07:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1753,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/Figure1.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Reports\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ag Economy Barometer: May 2022 - Purdue University\\\/CME Group\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/Figure1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-04T13:29:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-10-04T16:07:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/51da839c7d5454dec652fcf9020ed408\"},\"description\":\"Farmer sentiment improved in August as the\u00a0Purdue-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\u00a0index rose 14 points above its July reading to 117. The rise in the overall measure of agricultural producer sentiment was driven by increases in both the\u00a0Index of Current Conditions, which rose 9 points in August to 118 and the\u00a0Index of Future Expectations, which climbed 16 points in August to 116.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/Figure1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/Figure1.jpg\",\"width\":960,\"height\":696,\"caption\":\"Farmer sentiment drifts lower, rising interest rates contribute to uneasiness. (Purdue\\\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\\\/James Mintert)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Farmer Sentiment Drifts Lower, Rising Interest Rates Contribute to Uneasiness\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ag Economy Barometer\",\"description\":\"The Ag Economy Barometer is a partnership between Purdue University and the CME Group designed to assess the health of the agriculture economy.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/51da839c7d5454dec652fcf9020ed408\",\"name\":\"Anna Aarstad\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0e3240e476427ae854075cb498c3db40630df29fafb4d36af4cca9441393c4d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0e3240e476427ae854075cb498c3db40630df29fafb4d36af4cca9441393c4d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0e3240e476427ae854075cb498c3db40630df29fafb4d36af4cca9441393c4d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Anna Aarstad\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/author\\\/aaarstad\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ag Economy Barometer: May 2022 - Purdue University\/CME Group","description":"Farmer sentiment improved in August as the\u00a0Purdue-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\u00a0index rose 14 points above its July reading to 117. The rise in the overall measure of agricultural producer sentiment was driven by increases in both the\u00a0Index of Current Conditions, which rose 9 points in August to 118 and the\u00a0Index of Future Expectations, which climbed 16 points in August to 116.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ag Economy Barometer: May 2022 - Purdue University\/CME Group","og_description":"Farmer sentiment improved in August as the\u00a0Purdue-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\u00a0index rose 14 points above its July reading to 117. The rise in the overall measure of agricultural producer sentiment was driven by increases in both the\u00a0Index of Current Conditions, which rose 9 points in August to 118 and the\u00a0Index of Future Expectations, which climbed 16 points in August to 116.","og_url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/","og_site_name":"Ag Economy Barometer","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/purdueagribusiness\/?fref=ts","article_published_time":"2022-10-04T13:29:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-10-04T16:07:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":960,"height":696,"url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Anna Aarstad","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@PUCommercialAg","twitter_site":"@PUCommercialAg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Anna Aarstad","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/"},"author":{"name":"Anna Aarstad","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#\/schema\/person\/51da839c7d5454dec652fcf9020ed408"},"headline":"Farmer Sentiment Drifts Lower, Rising Interest Rates Contribute to Uneasiness","datePublished":"2022-10-04T13:29:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-10-04T16:07:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/"},"wordCount":1753,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1.jpg","articleSection":["Reports"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/","url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/","name":"Ag Economy Barometer: May 2022 - Purdue University\/CME Group","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-10-04T13:29:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-10-04T16:07:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#\/schema\/person\/51da839c7d5454dec652fcf9020ed408"},"description":"Farmer sentiment improved in August as the\u00a0Purdue-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\u00a0index rose 14 points above its July reading to 117. The rise in the overall measure of agricultural producer sentiment was driven by increases in both the\u00a0Index of Current Conditions, which rose 9 points in August to 118 and the\u00a0Index of Future Expectations, which climbed 16 points in August to 116.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Figure1.jpg","width":960,"height":696,"caption":"Farmer sentiment drifts lower, rising interest rates contribute to uneasiness. (Purdue\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\/James Mintert)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/farmer-sentiment-drifts-lower-rising-interest-rates-contribute-to-uneasiness\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Farmer Sentiment Drifts Lower, Rising Interest Rates Contribute to Uneasiness"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/","name":"Ag Economy Barometer","description":"The Ag Economy Barometer is a partnership between Purdue University and the CME Group designed to assess the health of the agriculture economy.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#\/schema\/person\/51da839c7d5454dec652fcf9020ed408","name":"Anna Aarstad","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0e3240e476427ae854075cb498c3db40630df29fafb4d36af4cca9441393c4d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0e3240e476427ae854075cb498c3db40630df29fafb4d36af4cca9441393c4d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0e3240e476427ae854075cb498c3db40630df29fafb4d36af4cca9441393c4d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Anna Aarstad"},"url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/author\/aaarstad\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12702"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12702\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12776,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12702\/revisions\/12776"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}