{"id":765,"date":"2016-11-01T09:25:16","date_gmt":"2016-11-01T13:25:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/?p=765"},"modified":"2016-11-01T09:18:56","modified_gmt":"2016-11-01T13:18:56","slug":"producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Jim Mintert, David Widmar, Michael Langemeier<\/em><\/p>\n

The Purdue\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer settled lower in October. Based on a survey of 400 agricultural producers across the U.S., the monthly measure of U.S. agricultural producers\u2019 sentiment was measured at 92, the lowest reading since March 2016 and the second-lowest Ag Economy Barometer value since data collection began in October 2015 (Figure 1).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Figure

Figure 1.<\/strong> Purdue University\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer, October 2015-October 2016.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

The decline in producer sentiment recorded during October was primarily driven by an erosion in producers\u2019 perspective regarding the long-run health of the U.S. agricultural economy. The forward-looking component of the Ag Economy Barometer, the Index of Future Expectations (Figure 2), settled at 95 in October, down from 109 in September and well below its July peak of 121.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Figure

Figure 2.<\/strong> Producer Index of Current Conditions and Index of Future Expectations, October 2015-October 2016.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

In the October survey, producers revealed strong pessimism about the agricultural economy\u2019s prospects over the next 12 months. The share of respondents reporting that they expect bad times financially over the next 12 months rose to 79 percent in October, an increase of 11 percentage points from the September survey and 16 percentage points from October 2015. The change in perspective from October 2015 to October 2016 suggests farm financial conditions have weakened considerably since fall 2015.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Figure

Figure 3.<\/strong> Share of producers expecting bad times financially over the next 12 months, October 2015-October 2016.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Price Expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n

A key consideration regarding future prospects for the U.S agricultural economy is the direction crop prices will move during the upcoming year. To better measure producers\u2019 crop-price outlook, they were queried regarding their expectations for movement in July 2017 Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) futures prices for corn and soybeans between October 2016 and summer 2017 (Figure 4). More specifically, producers were asked if they thought: 1) July corn futures prices would exceed $4.00 per bushel, 2) July corn futures prices would fall below $3.00 per bushel, 3) July soybean futures prices would exceed $10.00 per bushel, and 4) July soybean futures prices would fall below $8.00 per bushel.<\/p>\n

One-third of producers surveyed said they expect July 2017 CBOT corn futures prices to exceed $4.00 per bushel between October 2016 and next summer and a similar share of respondents (30 percent) expect July 2017 soybean futures prices to exceed $10.00 per bushel. Crop budgets for both of these crops suggest that futures prices at these levels for the 2016 crop would allow many Midwestern cropping operations to approach breakeven, especially given that many farms are harvesting above-average yields this fall. Farmers with this price outlook are likely those with an optimistic perspective regarding future financial conditions in the agricultural sector.<\/p>\n

In contrast to the optimism expressed by some survey respondents, a slightly smaller share of producers think a much more negative corn and soybean price scenario is likely. Twenty-seven percent of survey respondents expect corn prices to fall below $3.00 per bushel and 25 percent of respondents expect soybean prices to fall below $8.00 per bushel. Corn and soybean prices at these levels are below breakeven for the vast majority of U.S. farm operations and farmers with this price outlook are likely those with the most dire outlook regarding future financial conditions in agriculture.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Figure

Figure 4.<\/strong> Respondents’ expectations of July 2017 futures prices for corn and soybeans.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Producers were also asked about crop management changes they plan to make in 2017 as a result of farm economic conditions. Figure 5 provides the share of respondents planning to reduce fertilizer rates, reduce seeding rates, or change hybrid or seed variety trait packages in 2017. The most popular strategy reported by producers was lowering fertilizer rates, as 46 percent of respondents plan to employ lower rates in 2017. Thirty-five percent of respondents plan to adjust the trait packages of their hybrid or seed varieties, while only 19 percent reported that they plan to lower seeding rates in 2017. Survey responses indicate producers are making changes in their production practices in an attempt to reduce production costs as they continue to adjust to lower crop prices.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Figure

Figure 5.<\/strong> Plans to implement different agronomic management strategies in response to farm economic conditions.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Given the tight budget conditions and deteriorating outlook for the future, producers also were asked if they expected higher commodity prices, lower variable expenses, or lower fixed expenses to substantially improve their farms’ financial situations in the next 12 months (Figure 6). Only one-fourth of the respondents expect enough improvement in crop prices over the next year to improve their financial situation and just over one-fifth of producers surveyed expect variable expenses to decline enough for it to have a substantial impact on their operation in the near-term.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Figure

Figure 6.<\/strong> Respondents expecting various sources of change to substantially improve their farms’ financial situations in the next 12 months.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ag Thought Leader Survey<\/strong><\/p>\n

Each quarter, 100 agricultural thought leaders, including agribusiness executives, commodity association leaders, agricultural lenders and academics engaged in the agricultural sector are surveyed to gauge their perspective regarding the current state of the agricultural economy and future expectations. The Ag Thought Leader Survey provides an interesting opportunity for comparisons with producer responses, especially for key farm economy drivers.<\/p>\n

Figure 7 shows the agricultural thought leaders\u2019 expectations for July 2017 corn and soybean futures prices. Overall, the thought leaders were more optimistic than producers regarding crop prices. For example, 40 percent of thought leaders expect July 2017 soybean futures prices to exceed $10.00 per bushel between October 2016 and summer 2017, compared to only 30 percent of producers (Figure 3). Furthermore, fewer thought leaders expect the negative price scenarios to take place. For instance, only 13 percent of thought leaders expect July 2017 corn futures prices to fall below $3.00 per bushel, compared to 27 percent of producers.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Figure

Figure 7.<\/strong> Thought leaders’ expectations of July 2017 futures prices for corn and soybeans.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

When thought leaders were asked about sources of improvement for producers’ financial situations over the next 12 months, nearly 45 percent thought lower variable expenses would provide relief and nearly one-third expected lower fixed expenses to help. In both cases, thought leaders believe expense reductions will have more impact on producers\u2019 financial situation than producers expect.<\/p>\n

However, fewer thought leaders than producers expect higher commodity prices to improve producers\u2019 financial conditions. One-fourth of producer respondents expect higher grain prices to improve financial conditions over the next 12 months compared to just 8 percent of thought leaders who expect improvement attributable to higher grain prices. Furthermore, survey responses indicate thought leaders view rising grain prices as the least likely source of improvement in financial conditions, whereas producers viewed it as the most likely source of improvement.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Figure

Figure 8.<\/strong> Share of thoughts leaders expecting various sources of change to substantially improve farm financial situations in the next 12 months.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Final Thoughts<\/strong><\/p>\n

A decline in producer sentiment regarding future prospects for the agricultural economy pushed the Ag Economy Barometer lower in October. The Index of Future Expectations has declined sharply since reaching its peak in July, suggesting producers are significantly less optimistic about future economic conditions in agriculture than just a few months ago. Both agricultural thought leaders and producers expect lower expenses to produce some improvement in producers\u2019 financial condition in the year ahead, although thought leaders seem to think expense reductions will be larger and have more impact than producers think likely. Producers also indicated that they plan to change some of their production practices in 2017 in response to a challenging farm economy by reducing fertilizer usage, changing seed trait packages and reducing seeding rates as they look for ways to improve profitability.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Jim Mintert, David Widmar, Michael Langemeier The Purdue\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer settled lower in October. Based on a survey of 400 agricultural producers across the U.S., the monthly measure of U.S. agricultural producers\u2019 sentiment was measured at 92, the lowest reading since March 2016 and the second-lowest Ag Economy Barometer value since data…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-765","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-report"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nProducers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Jim Mintert, David Widmar, Michael Langemeier The Purdue\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer settled lower in October. Based on a survey of 400 agricultural producers across the U.S., the monthly measure of U.S. agricultural producers\u2019 sentiment was measured at 92, the lowest reading since March 2016 and the second-lowest Ag Economy Barometer value since data…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ag Economy Barometer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/purdueagribusiness\/?fref=ts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-11-01T13:25:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Figure1-300x203.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CCA General\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@PUCommercialAg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@PUCommercialAg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"CCA General\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"CCA General\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/045f3d601bcacb9a9c5a95fcbaddfd5b\"},\"headline\":\"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-01T13:25:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1281,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/10\\\/Figure1-300x203.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Reports\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/\",\"name\":\"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/10\\\/Figure1-300x203.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-01T13:25:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/045f3d601bcacb9a9c5a95fcbaddfd5b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/10\\\/Figure1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/10\\\/Figure1.png\",\"width\":978,\"height\":661,\"caption\":\"The Ag Economy Barometer fell nine points in October to 92, which is the second-lowest reading since data collection began in October 2015. (Purdue University\\\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\\\/David Widmar)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ag Economy Barometer\",\"description\":\"The Ag Economy Barometer is a partnership between Purdue University and the CME Group designed to assess the health of the agriculture economy.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/045f3d601bcacb9a9c5a95fcbaddfd5b\",\"name\":\"CCA General\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6681d00fded1d5d015581743869a5548dd7dbafef3595efb00a43c93d1864213?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6681d00fded1d5d015581743869a5548dd7dbafef3595efb00a43c93d1864213?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6681d00fded1d5d015581743869a5548dd7dbafef3595efb00a43c93d1864213?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"CCA General\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ag.purdue.edu\\\/commercialag\\\/ageconomybarometer\\\/author\\\/general\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017","og_description":"By Jim Mintert, David Widmar, Michael Langemeier The Purdue\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer settled lower in October. Based on a survey of 400 agricultural producers across the U.S., the monthly measure of U.S. agricultural producers\u2019 sentiment was measured at 92, the lowest reading since March 2016 and the second-lowest Ag Economy Barometer value since data…","og_url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/","og_site_name":"Ag Economy Barometer","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/purdueagribusiness\/?fref=ts","article_published_time":"2016-11-01T13:25:16+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Figure1-300x203.png","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"CCA General","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@PUCommercialAg","twitter_site":"@PUCommercialAg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"CCA General","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/"},"author":{"name":"CCA General","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#\/schema\/person\/045f3d601bcacb9a9c5a95fcbaddfd5b"},"headline":"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017","datePublished":"2016-11-01T13:25:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/"},"wordCount":1281,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Figure1-300x203.png","articleSection":["Reports"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/","url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/","name":"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Figure1-300x203.png","datePublished":"2016-11-01T13:25:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#\/schema\/person\/045f3d601bcacb9a9c5a95fcbaddfd5b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Figure1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Figure1.png","width":978,"height":661,"caption":"The Ag Economy Barometer fell nine points in October to 92, which is the second-lowest reading since data collection began in October 2015. (Purdue University\/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer\/David Widmar)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/producers-future-outlook-dims-attention-shifts-toward-2017\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Producers\u2019 Future Outlook Dims as Attention Shifts Toward 2017"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/","name":"Ag Economy Barometer","description":"The Ag Economy Barometer is a partnership between Purdue University and the CME Group designed to assess the health of the agriculture economy.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/#\/schema\/person\/045f3d601bcacb9a9c5a95fcbaddfd5b","name":"CCA General","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6681d00fded1d5d015581743869a5548dd7dbafef3595efb00a43c93d1864213?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6681d00fded1d5d015581743869a5548dd7dbafef3595efb00a43c93d1864213?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6681d00fded1d5d015581743869a5548dd7dbafef3595efb00a43c93d1864213?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"CCA General"},"url":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/author\/general\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/765","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=765"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/765\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":781,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/765\/revisions\/781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=765"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=765"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ag.purdue.edu\/commercialag\/ageconomybarometer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=765"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}