Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
:

HLA News: 2013 ASHS Growth Chambers and Controlled Environments Oral Competition Winners

Quick Launch

News Story Title

2013 ASHS Growth Chambers and Controlled Environments Oral Competition Winners

Abstract

The ASHS Growth Chambers and Controlled Environments Working Group (CEWG) is pleased to announce the winners of its first competition of the best student oral presentations related to controlled environment research at the ASHS Annual Conference.
 
The competition was held during at the American Society for Horticultural Science Annual Conference, July 22 - 25 2013 in Palm Desert, California.

First Place:  Olyssa Starry
University of Maryland, College Park
 
Title of presentation: Effects of Water Availability and Temperature on CAM Expression and Water Use Efficiency by Sedum Album and Sedum Kamtschaticum
 
Advisors: Mark van Iersel and John D. Lea-Cox

Second Place:  Celina Gomez
Purdue University
 
Title of presentation: Comparison of Light-Emitting Diode Towers Vs. High-Pressure Sodium Lamps for Year-Round Production of High-Wire Greenhouse-Grown Tomatoes
 
Advisor: Cary A. Mitchell
 
Abstract: Intensive year-round local production of greenhouse-grown vegetables requires the use of supplemental lighting to complement solar radiation in light-limited northern climates. Intracanopy light-emitting diode (ICL-LED) towers were compared to overhead high-pressure sodium lamps (HPS-OH) as an alternative supplemental light source for high-wire greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) production. Two consecutive experiments evaluating growth, yield, and energy consumption from winter-to-summer (increasing natural daily light integral (DLI); Expt. 1) and summer-to-winter (decreasing natural DLI; Expt. 2) were conducted in a northern climate (West Lafayette, IN, USA) to evaluate climatic responses to supplemental photosynthetic lighting. Cultivars Komeett and Success were grown in a glass-glazed greenhouse for five months. Plants were grown under one of three lighting treatments which included: 1000-W (Expt. 1) or 600-W (Expt. 2) HPS-OH lamps vs. LED-ICL towers (95% red and 5% blue) vs. no supplemental lighting (control). No differences were observed between cultivars for any of the parameters evaluated. Our findings indicate that equivalent increases in fruit number and yield can be achieved with the two supplemental light treatments compared to the unsupplemented control. Furthermore, significant energy savings can be achieved using the ICL-LED compared to the standard OH-HPS lamps (75% and 55% for Experiment. 1 and Experiment 2, respectively). Our results suggest that ICL-LED is a viable alternative to the widely adopted HPS-OH lighting.
 
Authors: Celina Gomez and Cary A. Mitchell, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
 
Specified Source(s) of Funding: NIFA SCRI grant 2010-51181-21369

Third Place:  Wesley Randall
Purdue University

Title of presentation: Determining the Effectiveness of Red and Blue Light-emitting Diodes As Supplemental Lighting During Seedling (plug) Propagation
 
Advisor: Roberto G. Lopez
 
Abstract: Annual bedding plant seedlings (plugs) are considered high-quality when they are compact, fully rooted transplants with a large stem caliper and high root dry mass. The objectives of this study were to: 1) quantify the effects of light emitting diodes (LEDs) and high pressure sodium lamps (HPS) as supplemental light sources to produce annual bedding plant seedlings; and 2) determine what red (R) to blue (B) light ratio produces the highest quality seedlings. Ten bedding plant species (Antirrhinum majus L., Begonia xsemperflorens L., Catharanthus roseus L., Celosia argentea L. var. plumosa L., Impatiens walleriana Hook. f., Pelargonium xhortorum, Petunia xhybrida Vilm.-Andr., Salvia splendens Sellow ex J.A. Shultes, Tagetes patula L., and Viola xwittrockiana Gams.) were grown under 100 μmol·m–2·s–1 delivered from HPS lamps or LED arrays with varying proportions (%) of red:blue light (100:0, 85:15, 70:30, and HPS) with a 16-h photoperiod. Seedling of Antirrhinum, Begonia, Impatiens, Petunia, and Tagetes grown under the 85:15 light treatment were generally more compact with a larger stem caliper and higher relative chlorophyll content than plants grown under HPS lamps. For example, stem caliper increased by 13.6%, 6.5%, 3.5%, 5.1%, and 11.5 % compared to seedlings grown under HPS lamps for Antirrhinum, Begonia, Impatiens, Petunia, and Tagetes, respectively. Relative chlorophyll content of Antirrhinum and Begonia increased by 11.6% and 14.0%, respectively, compared to seedlings grown under HPS lamps. Stem length of Antirrhinum, Impatiens, and Tagetes was 5.7%, 30.6%, and 20.8% shorter, respectively, compared to seedlings grown under HPS lamps. Seedlings grown under LED light treatments generally had higher quality parameters than those grown under HPS lamps.

Date Entered

9/11/2013

Url to External Story

2013 ASHS Growth Chambers and Controlled Environments Oral Competition Winners

Video

 

Departmental Display

Yes

Extension Display

Yes

Horticulture

Yes

Landscape Architecture

No

Tags

LOPEZ

Suppress Newsfeed

 

Attachments

Created at 9/11/2013 3:39 PM by Geiger, Carl R.
Last modified at 9/11/2013 4:00 PM by Geiger, Carl R.