2019 Indiana Pasture Land, Hay Ground, and On-Farm Grain Storage Rent

August 5, 2019

PAER-2019-11

Author: Craig Dobbins, Professor of Agricultural Economics

Estimates for the current rental value of pastureland, hay ground, irrigated land, and on-farm grain storage in Indiana are often difficult to locate. For the past several years, questions about these items have been included in the Purdue Farmland Value Survey. These tables report the values from the June 2019 survey.

Table 1 reports averages and the number of responses for pasture rent. The number of acres required to support a cow is also presented.

Table 1. Pastureland: Number of responses, annual cash rent, and carrying capacity, June 2019

Table 1. Pastureland: Number of responses, annual cash rent, and carrying capacity, June 2019

 

Table 2 reports the average per acre rental rates and the number of responses for established alfalfa/grass hay and grass hay.

Table 2. Rental of established alfalfa hay and grass ground, June 2019

Table 2. Rental of established alfalfa hay and grass ground, June 2019

 

Table 3 provides information about the value and rental rate for irrigated farmland. These rates are for the production of corn and soybeans. When producing specialty crops such as seed corn or tomatoes, rent is frequently higher.

Table 3. Irrigated Indiana farmland: Number of responses, long-term corn yields, estimated market value, annual cash rent, and rent as a percent of farmland value, June 2019

Table 3. Irrigated Indiana farmland: Number of responses, long-term corn yields, estimated market value, annual cash rent, and rent as a percent of farmland value, June 2019

 

Table 4 provides information about the rental rate for on-farm grain storage. The rental rate for grain bins includes three situations: where the bin only is rented, where the bin plus utilities are covered; and where a grain system is rented.

Table 4. On-Farm grain storage rental: Number of responses and annual per bushel rent, June 2019

Table 4. On-Farm grain storage rental: Number of responses and annual per bushel rent, June 2019

 

The first year for reporting this information was 2006. Past reports are in the Purdue Agricultural Economics Report Archive. This information is typically found in the August issue of the specified year. However, 2016 results are in the February 2017 issue and the 2017 results are in the April 2018 issue.

Publication Appeared Within:

Latest Articles:

The Iran Conflict and Global Food Security: Why the Burden Falls Hardest on the World’s Most Vulnerable

March 31, 2026

When an energy shock ripples out from the Persian Gulf, the headlines focus on oil prices, gasoline costs, implications for value chains and the profit margins of U.S. producers.

READ MORE

The Iran Conflict and Consumer Food Prices: A Broad but Lagged and Sticky Shock

March 31, 2026

The initial public reaction to an oil price shock reaching $110 per barrel is often to project near-immediate, dramatic increases in grocery prices. This instinct overstates the direct farm-to-retail transmission channel in a straightforward and measurable way. The USDA Economic Research Service tracks how each dollar of consumer food spending is distributed across the supply chain in its Food Dollar Series. The picture it reveals is sobering for those who expect large and rapid retail food price responses driven purely by higher farm input costs.

READ MORE

The Iran Conflict, Energy Prices, and U.S. Farm Profitability: A Balanced Assessment

March 31, 2026

The conflict that began on February 28, 2026, with U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on Iran triggered the closure of the Strait of Hormuz — the narrow chokepoint through which approximately 20 percent of the world’s traded oil and significant volumes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) flow. Within days, Brent crude oil surged from roughly $70 per barrel to over $110, the highest level since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Gasoline prices at the pump rose roughly 17 percent in the first two weeks of the conflict, and diesel — the lifeblood of farming operations — followed closely.

READ MORE