2025 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide

January 31, 2025

PAER-2025-07

Author: Michael Langemeier, Professor of Agricultural Economics

The 2025 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide, which is available for free download from the Center for Commercial Agriculture website, gives estimated costs for planting, growing, and harvesting a variety of crops, as well as estimated contribution margins and earnings. The guide is updated frequently as grain futures prices change and the costs of inputs, such as seed, fertilizer, pesticides, and fuel, fluctuate. This paper discusses estimates made in early January.

The guide presents cost and return information for low, average, and high productivity soils. Table 1 presents crop budget information for low productivity soil. Tables 2 and 3 present crop budget information for average and productivity soils, respectively. The discussion in this paper will focus on the estimates for average productivity soil. Double-crop soybeans are typically planted after wheat, so it is typical to combine the contribution margin for these two crops when comparing to continuous corn, rotation corn, and rotation soybeans. The yield estimates reflect trend yields for Indiana for each crop. The contribution margin for average productivity soil, obtained by subtracting total variable cost from market revenue, ranges from $89 per acre for continuous corn to $263 per acre for wheat/double-crop soybeans. The contribution margins for rotation corn and rotation soybeans on average productivity soil are $173 and $239 per acre, respectively. The contribution margin is used to cover overhead costs such as machinery ownership costs, family and hired labor, and cash rent.

From 2007 to 2013, the contribution margin for rotation corn on average productivity soil was higher than the contribution margin for rotation soybeans. The average difference in the contribution margin was $38 per acre during the 2007 to 2013 period. The situation was considerably different from 2014 to 2025. The average difference in the contribution margin during this period was an advantage for soybeans of $63 per acre. The projected difference in contribution margins on average productivity soil between corn and soybeans for 2025 is $66 per acre in favor of rotation soybeans. The projected difference in contribution margins between soybeans and corn is larger on low productivity soil and smaller on high productivity soil.

The projected cost of production and breakeven prices for corn and soybeans in 2025 are very similar to those experienced in 2024. The breakeven price for corn on average productivity soil is expected to drop from $5.33 to $5.27 per bushel. For soybeans, the breakeven price on average productivity soil is expected to drop from $12.45 to $12.30. Projected breakeven prices for corn and soybeans are 9.5% and 5.9% lower than budgeted breakeven prices for corn and soybeans in 2023. However, 2025 breakeven prices for corn and soybeans are approximately 18% and 13% higher than the corn and soybean breakeven prices in 2021.

Corn breakeven prices for 2025 for low and high productivity soils are expected to be $5.60 and $4.90 per bushel, respectively. For soybeans, 2025 breakeven prices on low and high productivity soils are projected to be $13.20 and $11.59 per bushel, respectively.

Expected corn and soybean prices, estimated using futures prices and long-run average bases, are substantially below breakeven prices, even for high productivity soils. As a result, projected 2025 earnings are well below zero. In the long run, earnings are approximately zero. When earnings are positive, owned assets such as machinery, buildings, and land, as well as unpaid operator labor, garner net returns above their opportunity cost (i.e., the value of the next best alternative). Negative earnings, on the other hand, indicate that owned assets and unpaid labor are receiving a net return that is below their opportunity cost.

What are the potential implications or consequences of the projected negative earnings in 2025? First, we would expect machinery and building purchases to be lower than they would be in a year with higher earnings (e.g., 2021 and 2022). In other words, depreciation is likely to be larger than machinery and building purchases in 2025. Second, we expect cash rents to be stable or experience downward pressure. Downward pressure is particularly likely given the fact that earnings were also relatively low in 2023 and 2024.

In summary, margins are expected to be relatively tight again in 2025. At this time, net returns for rotation soybeans are expected to be slightly higher than net returns for rotation corn. Thus, we would not expect continuous corn to be very prevalent in Indiana this year. The relatively high-cost structure, along with tight margins, increases the importance of carefully scrutinizing input and crop decisions, particularly those related to cash rent negotiations. Producers are encouraged to create crop budgets and, in general, improve their record-keeping.


Table 1. 2025 Purdue Crop Budget for Low Productivity Soil


Table 2. 2025 Purdue Crop Budget for Average Productivity Soil


Table 3. 2025 Purdue Crop Budget for High Productivity Soil


Figure 1. Fertilizer, Seed, Pesticide, and Cash Rent Cost per Acre Rotation Corn in Indiana

Figure 2. Variable Cost, Overhead Cost, and Gross Revenue per Acre Rotation Corn in Indiana

Figure 3. Fertilizer, Seed, Pesticide, and Cash Rent Cost per Acre Rotation Soybeans in Indiana

Figure 4. Variable Cost, Overhead Cost, and Gross Revenue per Acre Rotation Soybeans in Indiana

Tags

Publication Appeared Within:

Latest Articles:

The August 2026 Beef Import Waiver: A Narrow Tool Aimed at a Narrow Problem

August 25, 2026

This is a targeted policy aimed at a narrow slice of the beef market — imported product for ground beef, much of which is lean processing beef — rather than a broad intervention in the fed-cattle market. It was announced in response to historically tight cattle supplies and unusually high beef prices. Within that narrow lane, the most plausible effect is some additional availability of lower-cost processing beef and some downward pressure on ground-beef prices.

READ MORE

The July 2026 CPI and PPI Reports: The Energy Shock Bypasses the Food Pipeline

August 20, 2026

Energy prices are 14.7 percent above year-ago levels, and yet the raw agricultural commodities that sit at the head of the food pipeline are cheaper than they were last July. That combination is the whole story of this month’s release — but it is not evidence that the energy shock missed agriculture.

READ MORE

Indiana’s Farmland Market Holds Steady as Regions Swap Places

August 17, 2026

In sum, state-level aggregate farmland prices exhibited relatively modest changes from 2025 to 2026. Respondents suggest that the majority of market forces are placing downward pressure on farmland prices, so it is not surprising that they expect modest declines through the remainder of 2026.

READ MORE