Hog Producers Facing Losses

December 13, 2015

PAER-2015-16

Chris Hurt, Professor of Agricultural Economics

After low production in 2014 due to baby pig death losses from the PED virus, pork supplies rebounded upward by 7% in 2014. Producers have expanded the breeding herd by 1% in the past year, and thus pork production is expected to rise again in 2016 by an additional 2%. 

Demand has been weak in late 2015 and 2016 as well. The strength of the U.S. dollar is encouraging increased imports of pork and live hogs from Canada, and exports have weakened as well. Greater imports and lower exports both contribute to greater supplies of pork for U.S. consumers. Secondly, the announcement by the World Health Organization in which they linked bacon and processed meat consumption to human cancer in late October seemed to negatively affect pork demand. 

Live hog prices averaged about $52 per hundredweight for the first three quarters of 2015, but dropped substantially in the final quarter to about $44. Prices are expected to remain in the low-to-mid $40s in the winter and then move upward to the low $50s for the second and third quarters of 2016. Prices in the final quarter of 2016 are expected to be in the mid-to-upper $40s. 

On the positive side, costs of production for 2016 are expected to be the lowest in six years dating back to 2010. Total cost of production is estimated at around $50 to $51 per live hundredweight. This is in sharp contrast to 2012 when costs were estimated at $67 per hundredweight. Lower feed prices are the driver of lower costs. Annual U.S. corn prices dropped from $6.67 per bushel in 2012 to $3.69 in 2015. Soybean meal has dropped from an average of $440 per ton in 2012 to an estimated $310 per ton for 2016. 

Returns turned negative in November of 2015 as hog prices fell to six-year lows. Losses in the last quarter of 2015 were estimated at $18 per head. The industry is expected to experience losses of about $20 per head this winter. Very small profits are anticipated for the second and third quarters of 2016, before returning to losses once more in the last quarter. For the entire year of 2016, modest losses of $6 to $8 per head are expected. 

The industry needs to avoid any further expansion in 2016. Hog production is already large enough to have driven hog prices below costs. Total meat supplies will continue to move up 3% in 2016 with chicken production up 2% and beef production surging by 5%. This means pork will face a lot of competition in the meat case and the current anticipation is that the strong dollar will continue to be a negative for all meat prices. 

Tags

Publication Appeared Within:

Latest Articles:

The August 2026 CPI and PPI Reports: The Late-July Energy Spike Arrives, and the Food Pipeline Still Holds

September 16, 2026

Energy costs surged across both reports this month — diesel fuel up 24.1 percent, gasoline up 3.9 percent — in a single month. At the same time, food inflation sat almost exactly where it sat in July, and the most upstream producer-price stage swung through a wider range than the stage nearest the consumer has moved in three months combined. A real, measurable energy shock landing squarely in the data, alongside a food pipeline that barely moved, is the sharpest evidence yet for the thesis this series has been building since spring.

The August 2026 Beef Import Waiver: A Narrow Tool Aimed at a Narrow Problem

August 25, 2026

This is a targeted policy aimed at a narrow slice of the beef market — imported product for ground beef, much of which is lean processing beef — rather than a broad intervention in the fed-cattle market. It was announced in response to historically tight cattle supplies and unusually high beef prices. Within that narrow lane, the most plausible effect is some additional availability of lower-cost processing beef and some downward pressure on ground-beef prices.

The July 2026 CPI and PPI Reports: The Energy Shock Bypasses the Food Pipeline

August 20, 2026

Energy prices are 14.7 percent above year-ago levels, and yet the raw agricultural commodities that sit at the head of the food pipeline are cheaper than they were last July. That combination is the whole story of this month’s release — but it is not evidence that the energy shock missed agriculture.