Tax Implications for the 2012 Drought

August 23, 2012

PAER-2012-09

George Patrick, Professor

Crop Insurance: Crop insurance indemnities are generally included as income in the year in which the indemnities are received. However, a producer may elect to defer reporting the indemnities as income when received if the producer can show that the damaged crop would normally have been sold in the year following the year of production.

 

This election to defer reporting 2012 crop indemnities until 2013 applies to all of the crops for which crop insurance indemnities and disaster payments (if any) were received. If one defers, this means that the entire proceeds of crop insurance indemnity must be income in 2013. What test might be applied by IRS to qualify for deferral? One needs to be able to document that in the previous 3 years an average of more than 50% of the crops have been sold in the year after production. This would most likely document storage and deferral of sales as a normal business practice.

 

Only indemnities due to physical losses of production are eligible for deferral. Given the increases in corn and soybean prices from planting to harvest in 2012, the 2012 indemnities will be due entirely to physical losses. Unfortunately, indemnities paid by county-basis group insurance are not eligible for deferral because there is no direct relationship between the indemnity and an individual producer’s yield.

 

Indemnities cannot be reported as income before they are actually or constructively received. An indemnity received in 2013 for a 2012 crop is reported as income in 2013 regardless of when the producer normally sells the crop. This may cause problems for producers wanting to include indemnities in their income for 2012.

 

Given the very large number of claims in 2012, there may be a significant increase in the time needed to process a claim. Crop insurance agents may be able to indicate the likely time needed for processing. Checking information carefully in claim preparation helps avoid delays in processing.

 

Expected 2012 insurance claims of over $200,000 require up to a 3-year audit before the 2012 claim can be paid. Help your insurance agent start the audit process as soon as possible and be sure settlement sheets for grain are available from previous years to certify yields.

 

Be aware of possible aflatoxin contamination in corn. If aflatoxin is present, this generally reduces the value of the crop and thus increases insurance payout. However test for aflatoxin must be made before harvest and certified to the crop insurance representative. If aflatoxin is first discovered in stored grain, it is not covered for losses. Crop insurance coverage ends at harvest and thus does not cover losses in storage. So check for its presence and have testing done before harvest.

 

Producers should have alternative tax management strategies ready to be implemented depending on when the insurance indemnity is paid. As an example, having some grain on storage in December that could be sold in 2012 or 2013 provides more flexibility than having all of the crop insurance indemnities declared as income in either 2012 or 2013.

 

Livestock Tax Issues: Some livestock producers are reducing their livestock enterprises because of a lack of forages and high grain prices due to drought. Special federal income tax provisions are intended to reduce the impact of distressed sales of livestock in “excess” of normal.

1. I.R.C. § 451(e) allows postponement of the reporting of taxable gains on the sale of additional livestock.
2. I.R.C. § 1033(e) allows the avoidance of paying taxes on the gain realized from the sale of breeding, draft or dairy animals if they are replaced within a specified time period.
Postponement of reporting income from weather-caused sale of livestock may be available to cash basis taxpayers whose principal trade or business is farming and who are located in an area designated as eligible for federal disaster assistance. Sales in excess of a farmer’s normal business practice can be deferred until the animals normally would have been sold.
Example 1. Bill is a cow-calf producer who normally carries his calves over to the next year and sells them as yearlings. Because of the drought in 2012 and his lack of forages, Bill sells his 2012 calves in October 2012. In this case, Bill could postpone reporting the income from the 2012 calves until 2013.
Example 2. Jane normally raises and sells market hogs. Because of the 2012 drought, Jane sells 1,000 head as feeder pigs in 2012 rather than feed them to market weight and selling them in 2013 as she would do as her normal business practice. Jane could elect to defer reporting the sales proceeds until 2013.
A producer may reduce the size of the herd by selling livestock because of the lack of pasture and forages and plan to reinvest when conditions improve. Reporting the gain realized can be postponed if the livestock are replaced. Only the gain on livestock sold in excess of normal sales can be deferred. If the animals are not replaced, an amended return for the year of sale must be filed. However, producers do have some flexibility on the time and type of replacement property.
Example 3. Jack normally culls 15 of his 100 beef cows annually. Because of the drought in 2012, Jack sells 75 of his cows for a gain of $500 per cow. Jack can elect to not report the gain on 60 cows. If Jack does not reinvest at least $500 in 60 cows by the end of the reinvestment period, generally 2 years, Jack would need to file an amended return for 2012.
For further information, see IRS Pub. 225, The Farmer’s Tax Guide, or contact your tax advisor.

Tags

Publication Appeared Within:

Latest Articles:

The Iran Conflict and Global Food Security: Why the Burden Falls Hardest on the World’s Most Vulnerable

March 31, 2026

When an energy shock ripples out from the Persian Gulf, the headlines focus on oil prices, gasoline costs, implications for value chains and the profit margins of U.S. producers.

READ MORE

The Iran Conflict and Consumer Food Prices: A Broad but Lagged and Sticky Shock

March 31, 2026

The initial public reaction to an oil price shock reaching $110 per barrel is often to project near-immediate, dramatic increases in grocery prices. This instinct overstates the direct farm-to-retail transmission channel in a straightforward and measurable way. The USDA Economic Research Service tracks how each dollar of consumer food spending is distributed across the supply chain in its Food Dollar Series. The picture it reveals is sobering for those who expect large and rapid retail food price responses driven purely by higher farm input costs.

READ MORE

The Iran Conflict, Energy Prices, and U.S. Farm Profitability: A Balanced Assessment

March 31, 2026

The conflict that began on February 28, 2026, with U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on Iran triggered the closure of the Strait of Hormuz — the narrow chokepoint through which approximately 20 percent of the world’s traded oil and significant volumes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) flow. Within days, Brent crude oil surged from roughly $70 per barrel to over $110, the highest level since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Gasoline prices at the pump rose roughly 17 percent in the first two weeks of the conflict, and diesel — the lifeblood of farming operations — followed closely.

READ MORE