Tax Implications for the 2012 Drought

August 23, 2012

PAER-2012-09

George Patrick, Professor

Crop Insurance: Crop insurance indemnities are generally included as income in the year in which the indemnities are received. However, a producer may elect to defer reporting the indemnities as income when received if the producer can show that the damaged crop would normally have been sold in the year following the year of production.

 

This election to defer reporting 2012 crop indemnities until 2013 applies to all of the crops for which crop insurance indemnities and disaster payments (if any) were received. If one defers, this means that the entire proceeds of crop insurance indemnity must be income in 2013. What test might be applied by IRS to qualify for deferral? One needs to be able to document that in the previous 3 years an average of more than 50% of the crops have been sold in the year after production. This would most likely document storage and deferral of sales as a normal business practice.

 

Only indemnities due to physical losses of production are eligible for deferral. Given the increases in corn and soybean prices from planting to harvest in 2012, the 2012 indemnities will be due entirely to physical losses. Unfortunately, indemnities paid by county-basis group insurance are not eligible for deferral because there is no direct relationship between the indemnity and an individual producer’s yield.

 

Indemnities cannot be reported as income before they are actually or constructively received. An indemnity received in 2013 for a 2012 crop is reported as income in 2013 regardless of when the producer normally sells the crop. This may cause problems for producers wanting to include indemnities in their income for 2012.

 

Given the very large number of claims in 2012, there may be a significant increase in the time needed to process a claim. Crop insurance agents may be able to indicate the likely time needed for processing. Checking information carefully in claim preparation helps avoid delays in processing.

 

Expected 2012 insurance claims of over $200,000 require up to a 3-year audit before the 2012 claim can be paid. Help your insurance agent start the audit process as soon as possible and be sure settlement sheets for grain are available from previous years to certify yields.

 

Be aware of possible aflatoxin contamination in corn. If aflatoxin is present, this generally reduces the value of the crop and thus increases insurance payout. However test for aflatoxin must be made before harvest and certified to the crop insurance representative. If aflatoxin is first discovered in stored grain, it is not covered for losses. Crop insurance coverage ends at harvest and thus does not cover losses in storage. So check for its presence and have testing done before harvest.

 

Producers should have alternative tax management strategies ready to be implemented depending on when the insurance indemnity is paid. As an example, having some grain on storage in December that could be sold in 2012 or 2013 provides more flexibility than having all of the crop insurance indemnities declared as income in either 2012 or 2013.

 

Livestock Tax Issues: Some livestock producers are reducing their livestock enterprises because of a lack of forages and high grain prices due to drought. Special federal income tax provisions are intended to reduce the impact of distressed sales of livestock in “excess” of normal.

1. I.R.C. § 451(e) allows postponement of the reporting of taxable gains on the sale of additional livestock.
2. I.R.C. § 1033(e) allows the avoidance of paying taxes on the gain realized from the sale of breeding, draft or dairy animals if they are replaced within a specified time period.
Postponement of reporting income from weather-caused sale of livestock may be available to cash basis taxpayers whose principal trade or business is farming and who are located in an area designated as eligible for federal disaster assistance. Sales in excess of a farmer’s normal business practice can be deferred until the animals normally would have been sold.
Example 1. Bill is a cow-calf producer who normally carries his calves over to the next year and sells them as yearlings. Because of the drought in 2012 and his lack of forages, Bill sells his 2012 calves in October 2012. In this case, Bill could postpone reporting the income from the 2012 calves until 2013.
Example 2. Jane normally raises and sells market hogs. Because of the 2012 drought, Jane sells 1,000 head as feeder pigs in 2012 rather than feed them to market weight and selling them in 2013 as she would do as her normal business practice. Jane could elect to defer reporting the sales proceeds until 2013.
A producer may reduce the size of the herd by selling livestock because of the lack of pasture and forages and plan to reinvest when conditions improve. Reporting the gain realized can be postponed if the livestock are replaced. Only the gain on livestock sold in excess of normal sales can be deferred. If the animals are not replaced, an amended return for the year of sale must be filed. However, producers do have some flexibility on the time and type of replacement property.
Example 3. Jack normally culls 15 of his 100 beef cows annually. Because of the drought in 2012, Jack sells 75 of his cows for a gain of $500 per cow. Jack can elect to not report the gain on 60 cows. If Jack does not reinvest at least $500 in 60 cows by the end of the reinvestment period, generally 2 years, Jack would need to file an amended return for 2012.
For further information, see IRS Pub. 225, The Farmer’s Tax Guide, or contact your tax advisor.

Tags

Publication Appeared Within:

Latest Articles:

The Outlook for the U.S. Economy in 2024

January 16, 2024

Professor DeBoer explains why so many economists predicted recession in 2023 and why it didn’t happen. His analysis indicates slowed growth in 2024 from reduced spending but that recession could be avoided.

READ MORE

Trade and trade policy outlook, 2024

January 16, 2024

Professor Hillberry reviews trade and trade policy developments from 2023 including responses to the Russia-Ukraine war. Looking ahead he identifies the potential for trade disputes and how the election may shape US merchandise and agriculture trade.

READ MORE

Will 2024 bring a new Farm Bill?

January 16, 2024

Congress failed to pass new farm legislation in 2023, instead continuing the 2018 Farm Bill for one more year. In a 2024 election year, the time to produce a new five-year bill for agriculture may be short.

READ MORE

Delivered right to your inbox

The Purdue Agricultural Economics Report is a quarterly publication written by faculty and staff from the Department Agricultural Economics at Purdue University.

By joining this mailing list, you will receive an email when a new publication is released. This mailing list is kept solely for the purpose of sharing the report and is not used for any other purposes.