Policy Briefs logo, a Purdue University Department of Agricultural Economics policy report.

Policy Briefs by the Purdue Agricultural Economics Department aims to provide short insights, readable for the general public, on policy issues that are national in scope with an Indiana flare. We were initially motivated by the need to provide timely analysis in the lead up to 2018 Farm Bill discussions. However, the breadth of expertise in our department and the ongoing policy discussions related to farm, food, environment, trade, and development issues warrants a longer view and broader scope. The department hopes to enrich policy debates by providing data and context, quantifying impacts, and offering alternatives.

Publication Date: October 2024

Author: Laura Montenovo, Assistant Professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics

Summary: Tax policy shapes individuals’ incentives to give to charities. In fact, taxpayers can deduct charitable cash contributions as an itemized deduction, which decreases their taxable income and leads to a lower tax bill. Itemizing deductions, however, is not convenient for all taxpayers. Moreover, the standard deduction is the better option for those whose total itemized deductions for eligible expenses are lower than the current standard deduction. Taxpayers choose between the standard deduction and itemized deductions based on which yields the lower amount of taxable income and, hence, tax liability.
Publication Date: July 2024

Laura Montenovo, Assistant Professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics

Summary: This report examines the evolution of Indiana’s labor market from 2014 to 2023, highlighting the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, a swift recovery and growth in labor demand post-2021, and a return to pre-pandemic trends starting in 2023. Key indicators such as unemployment rates, employment levels, employment churn, and earnings are analyzed to understand these trends.
Publication Date: May 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: Last year’s inflation reduction act (IRA) added some $20 billion in conservation funds to farm bill programs for climate smart agriculture. Efforts to claw back those climate funds could complicate an already difficult farm bill process.
Publication Date: April 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: Passage of a Farm Bill in 2023 will depend critically on finding compromises on nutrition spending.
Publication Date: March 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: CBO’s February outlook identified federal deficit projections well above fifty year norms. Mounting concerns about economic growth and the size of the deficit indicate that new farm legislation in 2023 will likely need to be reduced from its estimated $140 bn/year cost to gain broad legislative support.
Publication Date: March 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: USDA’s changes to the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) in 2021 have increased spending estimates by more than a quarter trillion dollars over ten years. The TFP and other factors used in calculating SNAP benefits will be prime targets for introducing cost reductions into the 2023 Farm Bill.
Publication Date: February 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: In this policy brief, we examine nutrition and commodity program spending since 2018 and conclude that the success of general economic policies typically determine farm bill spending. While the CBOs baseline represents important information it should not be treated as an automatic signal that farm bill programs must be cut.
Publication Date: February 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: The projected cost for farm and nutrition programs over the next ten years makes the farm bill a significant target for federal spending cuts. Successfully passing a farm bill in 2023 depends critically on insulating the farm bill from broader partisan debate over the size of government
Publication Date: February 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: A key consideration for 2023’s Farm Bill will focus on legislated effective prices in the PLC program. In this brief, we examine why the PLC effective price calculation offers limited adjustment to increasing prices and input costs.
Publication Date: January 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: The 2023 Farm Bill process is sure to produce significant debate, analysis, and opinion. This primer covers some basic “language skills” for tracking farm bill discourse in 2023.
Publication Date: January 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: With current farm legislation expiring in September, we take this opportunity to review the process of writing a new Farm Bill for 2023 against the current timeline and political landscape.
Publication Date: January 2023

Russell Hillberry, Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: A look at the factors that could impact trade and trade policy in 2023.
Publication Date: January 2023

Roman Keeney, Associate Professor

Summary: At the end of September 2023, the most recent omnibus “Farm Bill” (passed in 2018) will expire. This deadline for reauthorization is one of a number of factors that promise an interesting 2023 for farm policy watchers.
Publication Date: April 2022

Pedro Antonio Diaz Cachay, Masters Student; Dr. Todd Kuethe, Associate Professor and Schrader Endowed Chair in Farmland Economics

Summary: We find that ERS forecasts for farm debt are unbiased, as the forecasts do not systematically differ from realized values. However, ERS forecasts are inefficient, as they over-react to new information.
Publication Date: April 2022

Hari P. Regmi, Ph.D. Student; and Todd H. Kuethe, Associate Professor and Schrader Endowed Chair in Farmland Economics

Summary: USDA baseline export projections exhibits downward bias. Projections of total exports and high value commodities are informative up to year four while bulk commodities export projections are informative up to year three.
Publication Date: April 2022

Haden Comstock, M.S. Student; Nathan DeLay, Assistant Professor

Summary: This paper finds that there may be a positive correlation between participation in the Federal Crop Insurance Program (FCIP) and time to adoption of certain Precision Agriculture Technologies (PATs).
Publication Date: April 2022

Carlos Zurita, Doctoral Candidate

Summary: The Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) is a novel á-la-carte agreement negotiated among members of the World Trade Organization. The TFA allows country member governments to choose only those provisions that they feel capable to be held responsible for. Hillberry and Zurita (2022) study the TFA’s cross-country commitment behavior and provide three main takeaways. Some TFA measures are perceived to be more difficult to implement than others. Countries with higher income levels are prepared to implement more measures. The content of commitments made is mostly explained by the number of commitments made. Although aid for trade facilitation helps, it may take decades for developing countries to fully implement the TFA.
Publication Date: February 2022

Megan N. Hughes, Ph.D. Student Agricultural Economics; Olivia Wyrick, Student Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences; Carson J. Reeling, Associate Professor; and Meilin Ma, Assistant Professor

Summary: A lack of regulation has led to variance in the quality of carbon offsets generated in carbon markets. Improved verification standards may help to improve the long-term sustainability of these programs.
Publication Date: January 2022

Larry DeBoer, Agricultural Economics Professor Emeritus

Summary: Uncertainty over the course of the pandemic and the response by workers and businesses to inflationary pressures are expected to be the determining factors in what is likely to be slower GDP growth in 2022.
Publication Date: January 2022

Author: Russell Hillberry, Professor of Agricultural Economics

Summary: While trade policy does not appear to be a major priority of the Biden Administration, it does affect many key objectives. One example is the supply chain problem, which may not be fully resolved in 2022.