September 2, 2026

Why U.S. Farmers Own Farmland and What They Expect for Land Values

by Michael Langemeier and Joana Colussi

Farm operators own farmland for many reasons, including current income, long-term investment, and family or sentimental reasons. Using results from the August 2026 Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer (AEB) survey, which included responses from approximately 400 U.S. farmers, this article examines reasons for owning farmland, factors influencing farmland values, and how producers perceive farmland as an investment. To facilitate comparisons, respondents were grouped into two categories: crop producers and livestock producers. Approximately one-third were classified as livestock producers, meaning they derived more than 50% of their farm revenue from livestock production.

n August, the AEB index increased to 135, indicating that average sentiment was more positive than during the index’s base period, which includes the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016. The AEB index is subdivided into two sub-indices: the Index of Current Conditions (ICC) and the Index of Future Expectations (IFE). Index values for August 2026 were 123 for the ICC and 140 for the IFE (Langemeier and Colussi, 2026).

Reasons for Owning Farmland

The August AEB survey asked respondents: “Think about the farmland that you own. What is your primary reason for owning this farmland?” Results are presented in Table 1. Family or sentimental reasons were the most frequently cited motivation, selected by 45% of respondents. Long-term investment ranked second at 32%, while current income was selected by 22%. These results suggest that farmland ownership is often motivated by considerations that extend beyond annual financial returns.

Table 1. Reasons for Owning Farmland

Table 1. Reasons for Owning Farmland

For comparison, Tong and Zhang (2023) asked a similar question in a 2022 Iowa landowner survey. In that survey, 38% of landowners identified current income as their primary reason for owning farmland, 23% selected long-term investment, and 37% selected family or sentimental reasons. Family or sentimental reasons ranked highly in both surveys, but AEB respondents were less likely to identify current income and more likely to identify long-term investment as their primary motivation. The comparison should be interpreted cautiously because the two surveys represent different populations. The Iowa survey focused broadly on landowners, whereas the AEB survey focuses on agricultural producers.

Periodically, the AEB survey asks respondents to evaluate farmland as an investment. Consistent with previous survey results, approximately two-thirds of respondents indicated that farmland is a good investment.

Expectations and Factors Influencing Farmland Values

Table 2 presents characteristics and measures of producer sentiment for the full sample, crop producers and livestock producers. In contrast to the producer sentiment of livestock farms, sentiment regarding future expectations for the crop farms was higher than sentiment regarding current conditions. In addition, a higher percentage of livestock farms expect farmland values to be higher 12 months from now. In contrast, a lower percentage of livestock farms expect farmland values to be higher 5 years from now. In general, producers are more optimistic regarding farmland values 5 years from now than they are regarding land values 12 months from now.

Table 2. Producer Sentiment and Land Value Expectations

Table 2. Producer Sentiment and Land Value Expectations

Another monthly AEB survey question asks respondents to indicate which of the following factors is having the most influence on farmland values in their area: net farm income, interest rates, alternative investments, inflation, liquidity, or agricultural policy. Respondents are not asked whether each of the six factors has a positive or a negative influence on farmland values. Alternative investments ranked as the most influential factor among both crop and livestock producers, followed by interest rates. The third most important factor was inflation for the crop farms and net farm income for livestock farms.

Farm Investment, Financial Performance, and Concerns

The Farm Capital Investment Index measures whether respondents think it is now a good time or a bad time to make farm investments, including items such as machinery and buildings. An index below 100 indicates that more respondents believe it is a bad time than a good time to make such investments. The Farm Capital Investment Index was 43 for crop farms and 49 for livestock farms. The higher index among the livestock farms is consistent with their higher sentiment regarding current conditions.

The Financial Performance Index measures whether a farm expects its financial performance to be better than, worse than, or about the same over the next 12 months. An index below 100 indicates that more farms expect their performance to be worse rather than better in the next 12 months. The average index for August was 103. Another monthly AEB question asks respondents to identify the biggest concerns for their farm, using the following response choices: lower crop and/or livestock prices, high input costs, environmental policy, farm policy, interest rates, and availability of inputs. High input costs were the biggest concern for both groups of farms. Approximately 45% of respondents indicated that input costs were their biggest concern.

Final Considerations

Results from August 2026 Ag Economy Barometer highlight that farmland ownership is motivated by more than current financial returns. Family or sentimental reasons were the primary motivation for 45% of respondents, while another 32% identified long-term investment as their main reason for owning farmland. Only 22% selected current income.

These motivations are consistent with producers’ broader views of farmland as an asset. Approximately two-thirds of respondents indicated that farmland is a good investment, and producers were considerably more optimistic about farmland values over the next five years than over the next 12 months. Alternative investments and interest rates were identified as the two most influential factors affecting farmland values.

The analysis suggests that farmland continues to play a unique role for U.S. farm operators. It is not only a productive asset, but also a long-term investment and, for many producers, an asset closely tied to family and generational considerations.

 


References

Langemeier, M. and J. Colussi. “Farmer Sentiment Rises Again in August as Future Expectations Improve.” Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer, September 1, 2026. Available at: https://ag.purdue.edu/commercialag/ageconomybarometer/.

Tong, J. and W. Zhang. “Iowa Farmland Ownership and Tenure Survey 1982-2022: A Forty-
Year Perspective.” Working Paper 23-WP 651, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, August 2023.

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Which Farmland Lease Is Best? Fixed Cash Rent, Crop Share or Flexible Rent

August 11, 2026

The lease structure you choose can change your farm’s risk, cash flow and upside—even when long-run returns look surprisingly similar. So which farmland lease makes the most sense for you? This Purdue Commercial AgBrief compares fixed cash rent, crop share and flexible cash rent and shows how each performs under different market conditions.

READ MORE

Comparing Net Returns for Alternative Leasing Arrangements

July 2, 2026

Leases on agricultural land are strongly influenced by local custom and tradition. However, in most areas, landowners and operators can choose from several types of lease arrangements: crop share, fixed cash rent, flexible cash leases. Each leasing arrangement has advantages and disadvantages. Rather than focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of various lease arrangements, this article uses a case farm in west central Indiana to illustrate net returns to land derived from crop share, fixed cash rent, and flexible cash lease arrangements.

READ MORE

Producer Sentiment and Land Value Expectations

May 1, 2026

Results from the March 2026 Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer reveal a clear divide in producer sentiment based on land value expectations. Farmers expecting declining land values report weaker financial performance outlooks, lower investment confidence, and greater concern about input costs. In contrast, those expecting rising land values are more optimistic and influenced by factors such as alternative investments. Tracking these differences provides important context for understanding shifts in the farm economy.

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

We are taking a short break, but please plan to join us at one of our future programs that is a little farther in the future.

2026 Crop Cost and Return Guide

September 16, 2025

The 2026 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide provides estimated costs and net returns for planting, growing, and harvesting corn, soybeans, and wheat in the upcoming year. Cost and return information presents information for low, average, and high productivity soils. Early projections point to slightly higher breakeven prices.

READ MORE

2025 Farmland Values & Market Trends

September 9, 2025

Purdue ag economists Todd Kuethe and Michael Langemeier as they discuss Indiana farmland values on this, the first of two episodes reviewing the 2025 Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rental Rates survey results. The survey shows Indiana land prices continue to rise and are anticipated to continue a modest increase for the rest of 2025 for most of the state.

READ MORE

Farmland Prices Increase Despite Downward Pressure, Purdue Ag Econ Report August 2025

August 19, 2025

Indiana farmland prices have continued the trend of record highs in 2025, according to the latest Purdue Farmland Value and Cash Rents Survey results. The average price of top-quality farmland reached $14,826 per acre, a 3.0% increase from June 2024. Statewide, cash rents increased from 1.5 to 1.7% for poor-, average-, and top-quality land.

READ MORE