Political divide affects American views on food inflation

Personal politics influences consumer perceptions of food inflation, with liberals estimating the increases at about three to four percentage points below conservatives, according to the monthly Consumer Food Insights Report.

The survey-based report out of Purdue University’s Center for Food Demand Analysis and Sustainability assesses food spending, consumer satisfaction, and values, support of agricultural and food policies and trust in information sources.

“The divergent perceptions of food inflation between liberals and conservatives is interesting to observe,” said Jayson Lusk, the head and Distinguished Professor of Agricultural Economics at Purdue, who leads the center. “Not only are liberals severely underestimating the increase in food prices from last year, but conservatives’ expectations for inflation are also likely overstating its rate for the coming year—at least compared to U.S. Department of Agriculture predictions.”

Purdue experts conducted and evaluated the survey, which included 1,200 consumers across the U.S.

Additional key results include:

  • Consumer food spending and inflation expectations decreased slightly.
  • Food insecurity levels have not increased despite record high food prices.
  • Liberals prioritize the social and environmental sustainability of their food more than others.
  • “Local food” is politically less polarizing relative to concepts like “plant-based” or “climate change.”
  • Both liberals and conservatives support funding for agricultural conservation and research programs.

Notably, both diet well-being and food happiness scales show little difference between liberals, moderates and conservatives. The political agreement over the quality of food that Americans consume highlights the success of the U.S. food system, which also shows in scores on the Sustainable Food Purchasing (SFP) Index.

“In a country as diverse as the U.S., we have been able to satisfy a great number of diets, tastes and needs,” Lusk said.

The SFP, a self-reported measure of food purchasing, assesses how well consumer shopping habits mesh with healthy diets from sustainable food systems. This month’s SFP index of 69 on a scale of 100 is unchanged from the July report. The ongoing stability of the SFP index shows that consumer willingness to make sustainable food choices changes little from month to month.

Graph on Consumer Agreement with Claims about Food and Nutrition by Political Ideology

But even when majorities of each group agree on some aspect of food policy, such as increasing conservation funding for farmers, liberals lead conservatives by at least 15 to 20 points in support for more government intervention, the report said.

There also remains a huge disagreement over the statement that “eating less meat is better for the environment.” This comes despite the different environmental impacts of plants versus animals now well-established by scientific research, said Sam Polzin, a food and agricultural survey scientist for the center and co-author of the report.

“It emphasizes the point that simply messaging a vegetarian or reduced meat diet is not going to move the needle on food sustainability, especially given the low adoption of plant-based diets across the political spectrum,” Polzin said.

consumer-budgetlo.jpgIn other survey findings, food ranked as the greatest budgetary stress for consumers based on a question asking respondents to pick their three expenses of greatest and least concern.

“We don’t have previous data to show whether this is a recent phenomenon given the high price environment,” Polzin said. “But, at a time when consumers continue to make changes to their shopping to adjust to prices, this highlights that food is one of the first essentials that gets squeezed under budget stress.”

The report also showed that the summer heatwave increased utility bills by 23 percent in many households, put a drag on consumer budgets, and led Americans to be less active outside their homes. Between one forth and one-half of the consumers reported spending less time exercising, going shopping, eating out, and drinking alcohol. The results suggest that future heat waves will put greater stress on budgets and reduce purchasing across several areas.

Lusk further discusses the report in his blog.

The Center for Food Demand Analysis and Sustainability is part of Purdue’s Next Moves in agriculture and food systems and uses innovative data analysis shared through user-friendly platforms to improve the food system. In addition to the Consumer Food Insights Report, the center offers a portfolio of online dashboards.

Consumer Food Insights - August 2022

Featured Stories

Brody Cox poses with arms crossed in front of Pfendler Hall
From Indiana 4-H to Purdue Agriculture

For Brody Cox, preparing for the Indiana State Fair began long before he entered the show...

Read More
Carolyn Foley leads a Great Lakes focus group in 2011; Foley on a boat with a University of Michigan student
FNR Remembers Carolyn Foley, Names Great Lakes Research Award

Carolyn Foley, a long-time member of the Purdue Forestry and Natural Resources (FNR) and...

Read More
Ag Barometer
Farmer sentiment drops as concerns about input costs increase

In the September Purdue University/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer survey, 52% of respondents...

Read More
Distinguished Ag Alumni Group 2026
College of Agriculture adds 9 to ranks of Distinguished Ag Alumni

Purdue University’s College of Agriculture recognized nine alumni at the Distinguished...

Read More
An image of the Learn-N-Burn trailer in front of a forested area at Martell Forest
Learn-N-Burn Trailer To Support Indiana Landowners

Keep your eyes peeled across Indiana for the newly minted Purdue Forestry and Natural Resources...

Read More
Mingyu Zhao
Mingyu Zhao - Graduate Ag Research Spotlight

“Being at Purdue has changed my thinking entirely,” says Mingyu Zhao, a third-year...

Read More