Immigration Enforcement, Labor Outcomes and Consumer Welfare: Evidence from U.S. Meat and Poultry Processing Plants

May 13, 2026

PAER-2026-23

Sampada Wagle, MS Student

Abstract

Immigrant labor constitutes a substantial portion of the US meat and poultry processing workforce. However, the downstream effects of deportations targeting these immigrants on their food safety practices remain largely unexamined. We provide novel empirical evidence on the relationship between deportations, labor dynamics in the industry, and safety practices in the meat and poultry processing sector. We utilize a unique unbalanced panel dataset of monthly inspection reports from approximately 6,000 federally inspected meat and poultry processing establishments observed in any given year, and the number of deportations, and Google search intensity capturing the fear and awareness of immigration raids from 47 contiguous US states and the District of Columbia, between 2004 and 2019. We find that increased deportations are associated with decreased food safety quality and reduced consumer welfare, as evidenced by an increase in food safety inspection violations at these establishments. However, we find no consistent evidence of fear and awareness of immigration raids affecting food safety inspection violations. Furthermore, evidence suggests that deportations increase quarterly separations, hires, and employment levels of workers in the industry. Wages have also increased in a way that aligns with labor shortages after deportations, aimed at attracting workers and maintaining operations. By examining changes in the labor force and potential downstream food safety risks associated with deportations, this research contributes to the broader policy discussion about the spillover effects of immigration enforcement on consumer welfare.

Tags

Publication Appeared Within:

Latest Articles:

The August 2026 CPI and PPI Reports: The Late-July Energy Spike Arrives, and the Food Pipeline Still Holds

September 16, 2026

Energy costs surged across both reports this month — diesel fuel up 24.1 percent, gasoline up 3.9 percent — in a single month. At the same time, food inflation sat almost exactly where it sat in July, and the most upstream producer-price stage swung through a wider range than the stage nearest the consumer has moved in three months combined. A real, measurable energy shock landing squarely in the data, alongside a food pipeline that barely moved, is the sharpest evidence yet for the thesis this series has been building since spring.

The August 2026 Beef Import Waiver: A Narrow Tool Aimed at a Narrow Problem

August 25, 2026

This is a targeted policy aimed at a narrow slice of the beef market — imported product for ground beef, much of which is lean processing beef — rather than a broad intervention in the fed-cattle market. It was announced in response to historically tight cattle supplies and unusually high beef prices. Within that narrow lane, the most plausible effect is some additional availability of lower-cost processing beef and some downward pressure on ground-beef prices.

The July 2026 CPI and PPI Reports: The Energy Shock Bypasses the Food Pipeline

August 20, 2026

Energy prices are 14.7 percent above year-ago levels, and yet the raw agricultural commodities that sit at the head of the food pipeline are cheaper than they were last July. That combination is the whole story of this month’s release — but it is not evidence that the energy shock missed agriculture.