July 1, 2022

Trends in Working Capital

by Michael Langemeier


Working capital represents the liquid funds that a business has available to meet short-term financial obligations.  The amount of working capital a business has is calculated by subtracting current liabilities from current assets.  Current assets include cash, accounts receivable, inventories of grain and market livestock, prepaid expenses (e.g., feed, fertilizer, and seed inventories), and investment in growing crops.  Current liabilities include accounts payable, unpaid taxes, accrued expenses, including accrued interest, operating lines of credit, and principal payments due in the upcoming year on longer term loans.

Working capital provides the short-term financial reserves that a business needs to quickly respond to financial stress as well as to take advantage of opportunities.  It provides a buffer to financial downturns that might impair the farm’s ability to purchase inputs, service debt obligations, or to follow through on its marketing plan.  It also provides the financial resources to quickly take advantage of opportunities that might develop (e.g., rent additional ground; purchase land; add a family member to the operation).

This article discusses recent trends in working capital and differences in working capital among farms, and provides working capital benchmarks.  Data from USDA-ERS as well as the Center for Farm Financial Management in Minnesota is utilized.

Working Capital Benchmarks

How much working capital does a farm need?  The answer to this question depends on both the risk and size characteristics of the farm, and volatility of the business climate.  In a volatile business climate and when a farm engages in enterprises that exhibit relatively more variability of net returns, more working capital is needed.  Larger farms also need more working capital, so it is best to determine the amount of working capital buffer relative to either gross revenue, value of farm production, or total expense.  Working capital to gross revenue, working capital to value of farm production, or working capital to total expense ratios above 0.35 are commonly used thresholds by financial analysts and would be considered an adequate level of working capital to weather a one- or two-year downturn.  When the working capital ratios fall below 0.20, a farm may have trouble repaying loans.  An individual can also measure working capital sufficiency using the current ratio, which is computed by dividing current assets by current liabilities.  A current ratio above 2.0 is a commonly used threshold.  When the current ratio falls below 1.0, a firm does not have sufficient current assets to cover current liabilities.

Trends in Working Capital

Figure 1. U.S. Farm Sector, Real Working Capital (Billions of $)

Figure 1. U.S. Farm Sector, Real Working Capital (Billions of $)

Figure 1 illustrates the trend in working capital for the U.S. farm sector since 2012.  Working capital dropped from $165 billion in 2012 to an estimated value of $65 billion in 2016, and then increased to $96 billion in 2021. Working capital is projected to be approximately $93 billion in 2022, down 3.3% from the 2021 level.


Figure 2. U.S. Farm Sector, Working Capital to Gross Revenue Ratio

Figure 2. U.S. Farm Sector, Working Capital to Gross Revenue Ratio


The working capital to gross revenue ratio for the U.S. farm sector since 2009 is depicted in figure 2.  From 2009 to 2014, the working to gross revenue ratio ranged from 0.22 in 2013 to 0.43 in 2010.  The ratio was above the 0.35 threshold in 2010 and 2012.  Since 2015, the working capital to gross revenue ratio has been below 0.20.  The 2022 projected ratio is 0.18, which is below 0.20, indicating that some farms may be having difficulty repaying loans.


Figure 3. U.S. Farm Sector, Current Ratio

Figure 3. U.S. Farm Sector, Current Ratio


Figure 3 illustrates the average current ratio for the U.S. farm sector since 2009.  The current ratio was above 2.0 from 2009 to 2014.  The current ratio bottomed out in 2016 at 1.59.  Since 2020, the current ratio has ranged from 1.85 to 1.89.

Obviously, the U.S. data is highly aggregated.  The FINBIN data summarized by the Center for Farm Financial Management at the University of Minnesota can be used to provide a more regional snapshot of trends in working capital over the last 10 years (i.e., from 2012 to 2021).  The average working capital to gross revenue ratio using the FINBIN data declined from 0.431 in 2012 to 0.256 in 2018 and 2019, and then increased to 0.326 in 2020 and to 0.406 in 2021.  Similarly, the average current ratio dropped from 2.65 in 2012 to 1.58 in 2018.  The average ratio in 2019 increased to 1.60, and then increased to 1.97 in 2020 and to 2.43 in 2021.  The strong net farm income experienced in 2021 improved liquidity to levels not seen since 2012.

Difference in Working Capital among Farms

The working capital to gross revenue ratio as well as other liquidity measures vary substantially among farms.  Using FINBIN data summarized by the Center for Farm Financial Management at the University of Minnesota, the median working capital to gross revenue ratio in 2021 was 0.367 or 36.7%.   Approximately one-half of the farms had a ratio above 0.35.  However, approximately one-third of the farms had a ratio below 0.20.  Of the farms that had a ratio below 0.20, approximately one-half of this group had a negative ratio, indicating that their current liabilities exceeded their current assets.

The median current ratio for the farms in the FINBIN database was 2.32 in 2021.  Over one-half of the farms had a ratio above 2.0.  Approximately 15% of the farms had a current ratio below 1.0.

The FINBIN results discussed above illustrate the tremendous differences in liquidity among farms.  Farms with lower liquidity levels need to very cautious in taking on more debt and when investing in capital assets such as machinery, buildings, and land.


This article provided working capital benchmarks and discussed trends in working capital and differences in working capital among farms.  Even with a strong net farm income in 2021, there still are farms with a very weak liquidity position (i.e., current ratio below 1.0 and/or working capital to gross revenue ratio below 0.20).  When the working capital to gross revenue is below 0.20 and/or the current ratio is below 1.0, farms will have difficulty repaying loans.  Just as importantly, when liquidity becomes very tight, farms have very little flexibility with regard to their input purchases, or the timing of their commodity sales.  In this situation, it also becomes increasingly difficult to borrow funds to replace machinery and equipment, or to rent or purchase land.



Center for Farm Financial Management, University of Minnesota, FINBIN website, accessed June 23, 2022.




What Does the Federal Fund Rate Increases at May FOMC Meeting Mean?

May 15, 2023

During the May 3rd Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, the FOMC voting members raised the Federal Funds Rate by another 25 basis points; making the target Federal Funds Rate between 5% and 5.25%. This Federal Reserve has consistently increased the Federal Funds Rate during each FOMC meeting for over a year.


Comparison of Conventional & Organic Crop Rotations (Spreadsheet Tool)

April 4, 2023

This spreadsheet compares conventional and organic rotations over a ten-year horizon. Specifically, net returns are compared for a conventional corn/soybean rotation, a conventional corn/soybean/wheat rotation, and an organic corn/soybean/wheat rotation.


Comparing Net Returns for Alternative Leasing Agreements

September 2, 2022

Obtaining control of land through leasing has a long history in the United States.  Leases on agricultural land are strongly influenced by local custom and tradition.  However, in most areas, landowners and operators can choose from several types of lease arrangements.  With crop share arrangements, crop production and often government payments and crop insurance indemnity payments are shared between the landowner and operator.  These arrangements also involve the sharing of at least a portion of crop expenses.  Fixed cash rent arrangements, as the name implies, provide landowners with a fixed payment per year.  Flexible cash lease arrangements provide a base cash rent plus a bonus which typically represents a share of gross revenue in excess of a certain base value.  Each leasing arrangement has advantages and disadvantages.



Purdue Farm Management Tour & Indiana Master Farmer Reception

Two outstanding farms in south-central Indiana will host visitors wanting to learn about farm and crop management on July 11th for the Purdue University Farm Management Tour. The Indiana Master Farmer reception and panel discussion will follow.

Read More

Prospective Plantings Report Update

March 31, 2023

On March 31st USDA released the 2023 Prospective Plantings and the March Grain Stocks reports. Purdue ag economists James Mintert and Michael Langemeier reviewed the information contained in both reports and discussed implications for the corn and soybean outlook in 2023.


2023 Crop Cost and Return Guide

March 24, 2023

The Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide offers farmers a resource to project financials for the coming cropping year. These are the March 2023 crop budget estimations for 2023.


2023 Indiana Farm Custom Rates

March 24, 2023

The rates reported in this publication were compiled from questionnaires received from farmers, farm owners, farm custom operators, and professional farm managers in Indiana. Purdue Extension Educators distributed the questionnaires at meetings and events statewide during the last month of 2022 and the first three months of 2023. Respondents were asked to report custom rates they had either paid or received during the past year.