Why Farmland Values will Drop in 2016?

December 13, 2015

PAER-2015-21

Craig Dobbins, Professor of Agricultural Economics

Low or negative crop returns are exerting a negative influence on farmland values, but low interest rates, so far, have been a source of support. However, the Federal Reserve Bank has been positioning to raise interest rates and the odds seem quite high for them to start soon. If rates do move higher, this will be one more economic indicator that would cause weaker farmland values. 

To show how falling returns and rising interest rates could impact land values, we use the simple capitalization model V=r/((i-g)) where V is the per acre value of farmland, r is the annual per acre net return to farmland, i is the interest rate, and g is the growth rate in the annual net return to farmland. 

This simple model indicates a 10% decline in the net return to land will result in a 10% decline in farmland values if interest rates and the growth rate are unchanged. 

To date, lower expected returns have likely been the major force weakening the farmland market. While there are still some reports of strong farmland prices, most broad surveys of farmland values in the Midwest consistently indicate that farmland values are declining. Because of different opinions in the marketplace, market values seldom adjust as quickly, or as precisely as the models forecast. 

Purdue’s Indiana Farmland Value Survey from June 2015 indicates that average Indiana cash rent for the 2015 crops was $229 per acre. If we use .06 for interest rates and .03 for the annual growth rate (historical average), this model values average Indiana farmland at $7,633 per acre ($229/ (.06-.03)). However, if the interest rate were to rise by 10% to .066, then the model would suggest farmland would drop to $6,361 per acre ($229/ (.066-.03)). The 10% rise in interest rates, drops land values by 17%. This example illustrates that interest rate increases are likely to have a larger downward impact on farmland values than declines in expected net income. 

More importantly, land values would be expected to fall more quickly in an economic environment of low returns in combination with rising interest rates. This appears to be the economic environment that agriculture will face in 2016. 

Since there is a limited supply of farmland on the market, the downward adjustment process will continue to be slow. On a statewide basis, I expect farmland values to drop 5%-12% in 2016. Declines toward the top end of this range are more likely if interest rates begin to climb by early in 2016. 

Publication Appeared Within:

Latest Articles:

The August 2026 CPI and PPI Reports: The Late-July Energy Spike Arrives, and the Food Pipeline Still Holds

September 16, 2026

Energy costs surged across both reports this month — diesel fuel up 24.1 percent, gasoline up 3.9 percent — in a single month. At the same time, food inflation sat almost exactly where it sat in July, and the most upstream producer-price stage swung through a wider range than the stage nearest the consumer has moved in three months combined. A real, measurable energy shock landing squarely in the data, alongside a food pipeline that barely moved, is the sharpest evidence yet for the thesis this series has been building since spring.

The August 2026 Beef Import Waiver: A Narrow Tool Aimed at a Narrow Problem

August 25, 2026

This is a targeted policy aimed at a narrow slice of the beef market — imported product for ground beef, much of which is lean processing beef — rather than a broad intervention in the fed-cattle market. It was announced in response to historically tight cattle supplies and unusually high beef prices. Within that narrow lane, the most plausible effect is some additional availability of lower-cost processing beef and some downward pressure on ground-beef prices.

The July 2026 CPI and PPI Reports: The Energy Shock Bypasses the Food Pipeline

August 20, 2026

Energy prices are 14.7 percent above year-ago levels, and yet the raw agricultural commodities that sit at the head of the food pipeline are cheaper than they were last July. That combination is the whole story of this month’s release — but it is not evidence that the energy shock missed agriculture.