November 20, 2019

Why Does my Lender Keep Talking About Working Capital?

by Michael Langemeier

Working capital or liquidity is one of the most important metrics that a business needs to track.  Working capital is computed by subtracting current liabilities from current assets.  Current liabilities include operating loan balances at the end of the accounting period, and term debt payments due in the next year on noncurrent (e.g., breeding livestock, machinery, buildings, and land) loans.  Current assets include cash, fertilizer and supplies on hand at the end of the accounting period, crops held for sale, and market livestock inventories.  Raised and purchased calves and feeders, raised and purchased pigs, as well as other non-breeding livestock inventories, should be included in market livestock inventories.

Though working capital by itself is an important liquidity measure, it is often more relevant to measure working capital in relation to gross revenue (value of farm production can also be used) or on a per acre or on a per livestock unit basis.  These adjustments make it possible to make comparisons across different farm sizes and over time for a farm that has been aggressively expanding.

Now, let’s turn to the title of this article.  Why is working capital so important in today’s environment?  To start with, working capital represents a farm’s first defense against financial stress.  When cash flow is tight or even negative, working capital can be used to cover the gap or shortfall.  Working capital is also needed to replace machinery and equipment, and to make down payments on land.  Working capital increases a farm’s flexibility in making these capital decisions.  With respect to land, a strong working capital position, puts a farm in a better position to cash rent or purchase additional ground.

A stoplight analogy can be used to establish benchmarks for the working capital to gross revenue ratio.  A working capital to gross revenue ratio below 0.20 would be in the red region.  A ratio between 0.20 and 0.35 would be in the yellow region, and a ratio above 0.35 would be in the green region.  The working capital to gross revenue ratio for U.S. farms has declined significantly during the last decade.  In 2010, the ratio was 0.43.  By 2015, the ratio had dropped to 0.19.  The projected ratio in 2019 is only 0.13.  Clearly, the low ratios exhibited in the last few years are concerning.

Recent studies by the author reveal large differences in working capital among farms.  For example, working capital to value of farm production for farms in the Great Plains that had a ratio below and above the threshold level of 0.35 was 0.15 and 0.83, respectively.  For a farm with a value of farm production of $500,000, this amounts to a difference in working capital of approximately $340,000.

This article briefly discussed why working capital is so important.  A strong working capital position helps a farm withstand cash flow shortages and enables a farm to take advantage of opportunities as they arise, such as adding a key employee or family member, or leasing or purchasing additional land.  More information pertaining to financial management can be found on the web site for the Center for Commercial Agriculture (here).

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Impact of Leverage on Rates of Return of Crop Farms

July 24, 2026

Increasing financial leverage will increase expected returns as long the marginal returns from the use of loans exceed the cost of borrowing. In favorable economic times, higher leverage can improve financial performance and stimulate farm growth. However, in unfavorable economic times, leverage can cause business performance to deteriorate rapidly. Thus, higher leverage may increase expected returns and financial risk.

READ MORE

Trends in Cattle Finishing Breakeven Prices and Net Returns

July 24, 2026

Cattle finishing is a tight margin business where profitability relies on feeder cattle prices relative to fed cattle prices and feed costs. This means that relatively high fed cattle prices, like we are experiencing in 2026, or relatively low feed costs do not necessarily translate into strong net returns. This article examines trends in feeding cost of gain, breakeven prices, and net returns for the last ten years.

READ MORE

What TractorZoom’s Data Says About the Future of Farm Equipment

July 23, 2026

Farm equipment markets are constantly changing, but what can auction data tell us about where agriculture is headed? In this episode of the Purdue Commercial AgCast, hosts Chad Fiechter and Todd Kuethe are joined by Andy Campbell, co-founder of TractorZoom, to discuss how data is reshaping equipment markets and the decisions farmers make every day.

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

We are taking a short break, but please plan to join us at one of our future programs that is a little farther in the future.

2026 Crop Cost and Return Guide

September 16, 2025

The 2026 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide provides estimated costs and net returns for planting, growing, and harvesting corn, soybeans, and wheat in the upcoming year. Cost and return information presents information for low, average, and high productivity soils. Early projections point to slightly higher breakeven prices.

READ MORE

2025 Farmland Values & Market Trends

September 9, 2025

Purdue ag economists Todd Kuethe and Michael Langemeier as they discuss Indiana farmland values on this, the first of two episodes reviewing the 2025 Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rental Rates survey results. The survey shows Indiana land prices continue to rise and are anticipated to continue a modest increase for the rest of 2025 for most of the state.

READ MORE

Farmland Prices Increase Despite Downward Pressure, Purdue Ag Econ Report August 2025

August 19, 2025

Indiana farmland prices have continued the trend of record highs in 2025, according to the latest Purdue Farmland Value and Cash Rents Survey results. The average price of top-quality farmland reached $14,826 per acre, a 3.0% increase from June 2024. Statewide, cash rents increased from 1.5 to 1.7% for poor-, average-, and top-quality land.

READ MORE