July 23, 2025

Farm Goals

by Michael Langemeier & Anil Balchhaudi

A farm goal represents a predetermined target that an individual or a business wants to achieve in the short or long run. Goals help shape the destination of any business, but they are especially vital in production agriculture, where producers face uncertainties such as weather variability, market volatility, and far-ranging policy shifts. The added complexity of family involvement, multi-generational planning, and long-term investment horizons further underscore the need for clearly defined goals to guide strategic and operational decisions.

Family businesses typically set both personal and business goals. Personal goals are often related to financial security, family goals such as statements related to education and leisure time, and values or core beliefs. Business goals vary widely among farms. For example, previous surveys have identified the following common farm goals: survival, maximize profit, maintain or improve standard of living, accumulate assets and net worth, reduce debt, avoid or mitigate low-income years, pass the farm onto the next generation, increase leisure or free time, and improve soil health. These goals are not mutually exclusive and most farmers pursue a combination of them, often with varying emphasis depending on their farm size or type, financial condition, or market outlook. This article presents results from a recent survey pertaining to farm goals, and discusses the relationships between farm goals, producer sentiment, and farm characteristics.

Relative Importance of Various Farm Goals

Using a similar methodology as used to create the monthly Ag Economy Barometer, a survey of 400 U.S. producers was conducted in late February 2025 to assess individual farm goals, producer sentiment, farm growth, succession plans, sustainability and risk preferences, resilience, and adoption of conservation practices. This article focuses on farm goals.

Six survey questions addressed individual farm goals. The first 5 questions had respondents rank on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating that a goal is not important and 5 indicating a goal that is very important, the relative importance of the following goals: avoid years of low profit, maintain stable income; maintain or improve the quality of soil, water, and air resources; maximize profits or get the best return on investment; pass the farm on to the next generation; and reduce debt over time. The sixth goal question asked respondents to identify their most important farm goal, based on the list of five goals noted above.

Adding up the scores for the first 5 goal questions resulted in an average goal score of 21.8. Obviously, a large proportion of the farms ranked numerous goals as either important or very important. In fact, 23.5% of the respondents indicated that all five goals were “very important”. The results of the identification of the most important farm goal are illustrated in figure 1. Farm transfer was chosen by 34.0% of the respondents as being the most important goal. Profit maximization and reduction in debt were chosen by another 21.5% and 19.5%, respectively. Goals were also highly correlated with one another. The only pair of goals that were not significantly correlated were the profit maximization and transition planning goals. The results clearly indicate that there is not one goal that dominates the rest of the goals. In other words, goals are multi-dimensional rather than uni-dimensional. We will discuss the implications of this result below.

Figure 1. What is the Most Important Goal for Your Operation?, Purdue/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer Producer Survey, February 2025

Figure 1. What is the Most Important Goal for Your Operation?, Purdue/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer Producer Survey February 2025

Relationship between Farm Goals and Farm Characteristics

We will next turn to the relationships between individual farm goals and various farm characteristics of respondents. Discussion will focus on items that were significantly different across goal choices.

Table 1. Producer Sentiment by Farm Goal Group

Table 1. Producer Sentiment by Farm Goal Group

Table 1 displays the index of current conditions (ICC), index of future expectations (IFE), and the ag economy barometer (AEB) for each of the five farm goals. The average ICC and AEB indices for those that chose profit maximization (conservation) as their most important goal were lower (higher) than the indices for the other farm goals. Respondents that chose farm transfer as their most important goal had the highest IFE index whereas those that chose profit as their most important goal had the lowest IFE. However, it is important to note that when examined as a group, there was not a significant difference in producer sentiment among the farm goal choices.

Table 2. Farm Growth Plans, Succession Plans, and Sustainability Preferences by Farm Goal Group

Table 2. Farm Growth Plans, Succession Plans, and Sustainability Preferences by Farm Goal Group

The differences in farm growth, succession plans, and sustainability preferences are depicted in table 2. The percentage of respondents who expect to expand their operations in the next five years was approximately 50% for each of the farm goal groups. As expected, the percentage of respondents that expected to bring a family member into the business at 47% was highest for those that chose transferring the farm business as their most important goal. Sustainability preferences (i.e., prioritization of long-run goals) were significantly different between the five farm goal groups. The percentage of respondents prioritizing long-term sustainability goals was substantially lower for the group that choice profit maximization as their most important goal compared to the group that choice conservation as there most important goal. Given the long-run nature of conservation decisions this is not particularly surprising.

Table 3. Risk Aversion, Regret, and Farm Resilience by Farm Goal Group

Table 3. Risk Aversion, Regret, and Farm Resilience by Farm Goal Group

Table 3 shows the differences in risk preferences, regret, and farm resilience among the five farm goal groups. Regret (i.e., once I make a decision, I don’t look back) and agility, measured as the assessment of advantages and disadvantages, are similar among the farm goal groups. Though not significantly different among the farm goal groups, as expected, a relatively higher percentage of respondents that chose stable income as their most important goal were strongly risk averse. In terms of absorption capacity, we asked respondents whether their farm had a strong balance sheet. On average, approximately 82% of respondents indicated that they have a strong balance sheet. In an April 2023 survey, 90% of respondents indicated that they had a strong balance sheet (Lippsmeyer et al., 2023). In this study, those that chose reduction in debt as their most important goal tended to have balance sheets that were not as strong as those that chose other farm goals.

Table 4. Climate Change Adoption, Crop Diversification, No-Till Adoption, and Cover Crop Adoption by Farm Goal Group

Table 4. Climate Change Adoption, Crop Diversification, No-Till Adoption, and Cover Crop Adoption by Farm Goal Group

The differences in climate adaptation, crop diversification, no-till adoption, and cover crop use are displayed in table 4. Adaptation to changing weather patterns and cover crop adoption are similar among the farm goal groups. In terms of climate adaptation, respondents were given the following choices: installed tile drainage, installed irrigation, planted cover crops, changed crop mix, adopted no-till, changed crop varieties, and changed planting dates. The three most common adaptations, in order, were changed planting dates, installed tile drainage, and changed crop varieties. Crop diversification (i.e., adding a new crop to improve long-run sustainability) and the adoption of no-till practices were relatively lower for respondents that choice reduction in debt as there most important goal and relatively higher for respondents that choice conservation as there most important goal. It is interesting to note that the respondents that chose reduction in debt as their most important goal tended to have lower rates of adoption in table 4. Their current financial position may make it more difficult to introduce a new crop, adopt no-till practices, and use cover crops.

The relationships between farm goals and farm demographics such as farm size, educational level, and operator age were also explored. There was a positive relationship between educational level and choosing conservation as a farm’s most important goal. Operator age was positively related to choosing the farm transfer goal and negatively related to choosing the reduction in debt goal. In other words, younger operations were more worried about repaying debt and older operators were more concerned about transferring the farm to the next generation.

Implications of Having Multiple Goals

As confirmed in our survey, it is very rare for a farm to have a single goal though some goals are more important than others. Having a hierarchy of goals is important because goals may conflict with one another. Rather than focusing on a single goal, such as profit maximization, it is often useful to think about tradeoffs between goals. For instance, an individual farm may have goals related to increasing net worth, risk mitigation, and soil health. It will be next to impossible to optimize these three goals simultaneously. Rather than optimizing each goal, think about a level for each of these goals that would be satisfactory or that the farm could live with. As another example, to reduce risk when making crop marketing decisions, it is usually necessary to reduce expected net returns. The optimal strategy involves trying to come up with a mix of marketing strategies that reduces risk more than it reduces expected net returns (Lenfestey and Langemeier, 2023).

Conclusions

This article presents results from a recent survey pertaining to farm goals, and discusses the relationships between farm goals, producer sentiment, and farm characteristics. Survey respondents were asked to identify their most important farm goal using the following list: stable income, conservation, profit, farm transfer, and reduce debt. All five goals were chosen by at least 10% of the respondents. The most common choice was farm transfer, which was chosen by one-third of the respondents. We encourage readers to think about the goals that are important to their farm or business. After listing important goals, think about the tradeoffs between these goals and how the goals can be used to make long-run strategic decisions.

 

 


Citations

Lenfestey, G. and M. Langemeier. “Comparing Corn Marketing Strategies.” Center for Commercial Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, July 20, 2023.

Lippsmeyer, M., M. Langemeier, J. Mintert, and N. Thompson. “Factors Impacting Succession Planning.” Center for Commercial Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, September 7, 2023.

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Adoption of Conservation Practices and Farm Goals

July 29, 2025

How do farm goals shape conservation decisions? This analysis draws on a nationwide survey of 400 producers to explore how priorities like profitability, risk, and sustainability impact the adoption of practices like no-till, cover crops, and crop diversification. Farmers who rank conservation as a top goal are significantly more likely to implement these practices—offering a window into what drives long-term thinking in farm management.

READ MORE

The Role of Technology in Improving Farm Profitability | Commodity Classic 2025

March 12, 2025

Each year, numerous emerging technologies claim to boost your production, reduce input usage, or streamline your farm’s operations. However, the effectiveness of these technologies varies across different farms. Purdue ag economists James Mintert, Michael Langemeier, and Chad Fiechter examined how technology affects long-term farm growth and profitability, and share insights from farm financial records and farmer surveys during their 2025 Commodity Classic Learning Center Session on March 4, 2025. Watch the recording now!

READ MORE

Contingency Planning with Cash Flow Shortages

March 5, 2025

Contingency plans related to how to respond to changes in projected cash flows are important. Given the expected drop in crop prices this fall and wide variability in expected prices, it would be prudent for a farm to examine the sensitivity of their cash flow and repayment capacity to changes in crop prices. Using a case farm in southwest Indiana, Michael illustrates how contingency plans could be used.

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

Purdue Flexible Lease Workshop

September 16 at 7 pm or September 23 at 9 am

The Flexible Lease virtual Workshop, presented by the Purdue Extension Land Lease Team, will include a presentation and discussion to help you decide if a flexible land lease arrangement is right for your farm.

Read More

2026 Crop Cost and Return Guide

September 16, 2025

The 2026 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide provides estimated costs and net returns for planting, growing, and harvesting corn, soybeans, and wheat in the upcoming year. Cost and return information presents information for low, average, and high productivity soils. Early projections point to slightly higher breakeven prices.

READ MORE

2025 Farmland Values & Market Trends

September 9, 2025

Purdue ag economists Todd Kuethe and Michael Langemeier as they discuss Indiana farmland values on this, the first of two episodes reviewing the 2025 Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rental Rates survey results. The survey shows Indiana land prices continue to rise and are anticipated to continue a modest increase for the rest of 2025 for most of the state.

READ MORE

Farmland Prices Increase Despite Downward Pressure, Purdue Ag Econ Report August 2025

August 19, 2025

Indiana farmland prices have continued the trend of record highs in 2025, according to the latest Purdue Farmland Value and Cash Rents Survey results. The average price of top-quality farmland reached $14,826 per acre, a 3.0% increase from June 2024. Statewide, cash rents increased from 1.5 to 1.7% for poor-, average-, and top-quality land.

READ MORE