February 12, 2016

Leverage and Financial Risk

Financial risk is incurred when a farm borrows money to purchase assets or operate the farm. Financial risk is caused by uncertainty pertaining to interest rates, lending relationships, changes in market value of assets used as collateral, and cash flow used to repay debt. Financial risk is often inter-related with other sources of risk, particularly production and technical, and price and market risk. For instance, when production and/or prices are relatively low, a farm is going to have more difficulty repaying loans and the market value of assets is likely going to soften and perhaps even decline in value.

Managing financial risk is an extremely broad topic. Sub-topics would include managing capital structure (i.e., mix of debt and equity capital), examining the relationship between leverage and risk, using credit reserves, liquidation costs or converting risky assets to cash, using self-liquidating loans, and fixed interest rates. The discussion below focuses on the relationship between leverage and financial risk.

Leverage is typically measured with the debt to asset ratio. On average, leverage on U.S. farms is likely to increase for two reasons. First, relatively low net farm income in the 2015 and 2016 will likely have a dampening impact on farm asset values. Second, the relatively low net farm income will make it more difficult to repay debt in a timely manner. Total debt on U.S. farms has increased from $278.9 billion in 2010 to $367.4 billion in 2015, a 31.7 percent increase (USDA-ERS, 2015). In the last year alone, debt has increased $21.7 billion or 6.3 percent. Debt be categories as non-real estate and real estate debt. Non-real estate debt and real estate debt increased 6.1 percent and 6.5 percent, respectively, in the last year (USDA-ERS). Though the debt to asset ratio in 2015 for U.S. farms is still relatively low (12.8 percent), farms with below average equity and above average debt could see a relatively large change in their debt to asset ratio in the next couple of years. It is worth noting that the average debt to asset ratio for U.S. farms increased from 11.7 to 12.8 percent in the last year.

Now that we have established that the debt to asset ratio for farms is likely to increase, let’s address a fundamental question. Does leverage help or hinder? Answering this question is really quite difficult and depends on two related questions. First, is a farm’s return on equity higher than return on assets? If return on equity is higher than return on assets, leverage is working for you. Conversely, if return on equity is less than return on assets, leverage is working against you. In this situation, a farm would have been better off not borrowing the money. Second, what is your tolerance for risk? Leverage increases both variability in returns and downside risk. A farmer that is risk averse will take this into account when evaluating the use of debt. A farmer that is risk neutral, on the other hand, will simply examine the relationship between return on equity and return on assets. If return on equity is higher than return on assets this farmer will borrow money. A farmer that is risk averse will take into account risk aversion and the relationship between return on equity and return on assets before borrowing money. The more risk averse the farmer is the less likely he or she will be to borrow money.

Table 1. Illustration of the Relationship Between Leverage and Risk

Table 1. Illustration of the Relationship Between Leverage and Risk

Figure 1. Relationship between Leverage and Risk

Figure 1. Relationship between Leverage and Risk

Table 1 and figure 1 illustrate the impact of leverage on the rate of return on farm equity for three value of farm production (VFP) scenarios. VFP is a commonly used measure of accrual gross income on farms. The average VFP scenario represents average profitability and financial efficiency for this case farm. The low VFP scenario assumes that revenue for the case farm is 20 percent lower than average while the high VFP scenario assumes that revenue is 20 percent higher than average. Costs were assumed to be same for each VFP scenario. Retained earnings were computed by subtracting family living expenditures from net farm income. The resulting retained earnings for each VFP scenario were then added to ending total assets, which was used to compute average total assets. Three leverage levels are illustrated: low leverage (0 percent debt to asset ratio), medium leverage (25 percent debt to asset ratio), and high leverage (50 percent debt to asset ratio). Interest paid and average total liabilities vary among the leverage levels. As shown in table 1 and figure 1, the rate of return on farm equity for the high leverage level is considerable more variable than the rate for the low and average leverage levels. The rate of return varied from -0.0189 to 0.1232 for the low leverage level, from -0.0253 to 0.1609 for the average leverage level, and from -0.0382 to 0.2320 for the high leverage level. Another important thing to note in table 1 is that for this case farm under the average and high VFP scenarios leverage had a positive impact on the rate of return on farm equity. Specifically, under these two VFP scenarios, rates of return increased as leverage increased. However, it is also important to note that under the low VFP scenario, rates of return decreased as leverage increased.

This article described financial risk and illustrated the impact of leverage on financial performance. Leverage was found to increase the variability of the rate of return on farm equity. For the case farm, leverage had a positive impact on the rate of return on farm equity for a high VFP scenario. The impact of leverage was negative for a low VFP scenario. As margins remain tight in production agriculture, it is important for farms to carefully assess their use of debt as well as changes in debt levels resulting from lower asset values and increased difficulty repaying loans.

 


References

United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. U.S. Farm Sector Financial Indicators, November 24, 2015.

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Financial Stress on Crop Farms: Who Is Most at Risk in the 2024–26 Downturn?

September 3, 2025

Midwest crop producers have experienced a significant downturn in corn, soybean, and wheat prices since late 2023, resulting in a drop in net returns in 2024. Moreover, current expectations are that prices will continue to remain at or below the cost of production for at least a couple more years. Consequently, a key question being asked is as follows: “Who is the most vulnerable financially during this downturn”?

READ MORE

Adoption of Conservation Practices and Farm Goals

July 29, 2025

How do farm goals shape conservation decisions? This analysis draws on a nationwide survey of 400 producers to explore how priorities like profitability, risk, and sustainability impact the adoption of practices like no-till, cover crops, and crop diversification. Farmers who rank conservation as a top goal are significantly more likely to implement these practices—offering a window into what drives long-term thinking in farm management.

READ MORE

Decomposition of Statement of Cash Flows

June 5, 2025

Cash flow trends from 2007 to 2024 show how crop farms rely on operating income and borrowed funds to drive growth through asset purchases. As income levels shift, so do investment decisions—offering key insights for managing through expected challenges in 2025.

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

Purdue Flexible Lease Workshop

September 16 at 7 pm or September 23 at 9 am

The Flexible Lease virtual Workshop, presented by the Purdue Extension Land Lease Team, will include a presentation and discussion to help you decide if a flexible land lease arrangement is right for your farm.

Read More

2026 Crop Cost and Return Guide

September 16, 2025

The 2026 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide provides estimated costs and net returns for planting, growing, and harvesting corn, soybeans, and wheat in the upcoming year. Cost and return information presents information for low, average, and high productivity soils. Early projections point to slightly higher breakeven prices.

READ MORE

2025 Farmland Values & Market Trends

September 9, 2025

Purdue ag economists Todd Kuethe and Michael Langemeier as they discuss Indiana farmland values on this, the first of two episodes reviewing the 2025 Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rental Rates survey results. The survey shows Indiana land prices continue to rise and are anticipated to continue a modest increase for the rest of 2025 for most of the state.

READ MORE

Farmland Prices Increase Despite Downward Pressure, Purdue Ag Econ Report August 2025

August 19, 2025

Indiana farmland prices have continued the trend of record highs in 2025, according to the latest Purdue Farmland Value and Cash Rents Survey results. The average price of top-quality farmland reached $14,826 per acre, a 3.0% increase from June 2024. Statewide, cash rents increased from 1.5 to 1.7% for poor-, average-, and top-quality land.

READ MORE