March 5, 2026

Producer Sentiment, Farm Growth, and Transition Planning

by Michael Langemeier and Joana Colussi

While U.S. livestock producers have benefited from stronger market conditions, crop producers continue to face tighter margins. Results from the February 2026 Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer (AEB) survey provide insight into how these differences are influencing producer sentiment, growth expectations, and transition plans by farm type. The AEB index is computed monthly to gauge sentiment among approximately 400 U.S. agricultural producers (Langemeier and Colussi, 2026).
The barometer’s index for February 2026 was 116, indicating that average sentiment was more positive than during the index’s base period (i.e., the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016). The AEB index is subdivided into two sub-indices: the Index of Current Conditions (ICC) and the Index of Future Expectations (IFE). Index values for February 2026 were 121 for the ICC and 113 for the IFE.

Producer Sentiment by Farm Type

Every month, respondents to the AEB survey are asked whether crop or livestock producers will have widespread good times or widespread bad times over the next five years. A separate question is used for crops and livestock. These two questions are addressed to all respondents. In the February 2026 survey, 22% of respondents indicated that crop producers will have widespread good times, and 69% of respondents indicated that livestock producers will have widespread good times.

The monthly survey also includes two questions related to livestock production. The first question asks producers whether their farm has a beef, hog, or dairy operation. The second question is addressed to those who answer the first question affirmatively and asks whether their livestock operation accounts for less than 25%, 25 to 50%, 50 to 75%, or more than 75% of their farm’s revenue.

We used the two livestock questions from the February 2026 survey to divide the monthly survey respondents into two groups. The first group (257 farms) derived less than 50% of their revenue from livestock production, and the second group (144 farms) derived 50% or more of their revenue from livestock production.

Producer sentiment in the February 2026 survey for all respondents and for crop and livestock farms is presented in Table 1. The average AEB index for livestock farms was 140, which was 38 points higher than the index for crop farms. A similar difference in producer sentiment between crop and livestock producers was found in the August 2025 survey (Langemeier, Mintert, and Colussi, 2025). The difference in the ICC index for the two groups was much wider than the difference in the IFE index. Producer sentiment for livestock farms can be used to help explain why the ICC index was higher than the IFE index for all respondents.

Table 1. Producer Sentiment by Farm Type

Table 1. Producer Sentiment by Farm Type

 

The Farm Capital Investment index measures whether respondents think now it is a good time or a bad time to make farm investments, including items such as machinery and buildings. An index below 100 indicates that more respondents think it is a bad time rather than a good time to make such investments. The Farm Capital Investment index was 46 for crop farms and a slightly more optimistic 59 for livestock farms in the February AEB survey.

The Financial Performance index measures whether a farm expects its financial performance to be better than, worse than, or about the same in the next 12 months. An index below 100 indicates that more farms expect their performance to be worse rather than better in the next 12 months. The average index for August was 94. The average index for crop farms was 89 while livestock farms, with a reading of 104, were more optimistic.

Another monthly AEB question asks respondents to identify their biggest concerns for their farm using the following response choices: lower crop and/or livestock prices, high input costs, environmental policy, farm policy, interest rates, and availability of inputs. High input costs were the biggest concern for both crop and livestock farms. Sentiment regarding exports in the next five years, resilience to shocks, the advantages of diversification, and whether the U.S. was headed in the right direction or on the wrong track was similar between crop and livestock producers.

Farm Growth and Transition Planning

Questions pertaining to farm growth, farm goals, and transition planning were included in the February 2026 AEB survey. The farm growth question was posed as follows: What is a reasonable annual growth expectation you have for your farm over the next five years? Potential answers include the following: reduce farm size, no plans to grow, 0 to 5% annual growth, 5 to 10% annual growth, 10 to 15% annual growth, and more than 15% annual growth. Summary information for the entire group of farms, for crop producers, and for livestock producers is presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. Approximately 51% of crop producers and 46% of livestock producers either plan to reduce their farm size or have no plans to grow. At the other end of the spectrum, a higher percentage of livestock producers (24% vs. 9%) intend to grow by more than 10%.

Figure 1. What is a reasonable annual growth rate expectation you have for your farm over the next 5 years?

Figure 1. What is a reasonable annual growth rate expectation you have for your farm over the next 5 years?

 

The farm goal question was as follows: What is the most important farm goal for your operation? Choices were as follows: avoid years of low profit, maintain stable income; maintain or improve the quality of soil, water, and air resources; maximize profits; pass the farm on to the next generation; and reduce debt over time. For both crop and livestock producers, passing the farm on to the next generation was the most important goal, with 38% of crop producers and 40% of livestock producers choosing this goal as the most important. Consistent with this goal, approximately 35% of crop producers and 38% of livestock producers plan to bring another family member into the business in the next five years.

Conclusions

Given the large difference in prices received and projected net return prospects, it is not surprising to find a large difference in producer sentiment between crop and livestock producers in the February 2026 AEB survey. In contrast to producer sentiment, farm growth and transition plans are similar among crop and livestock producers. Approximately 50% of respondents to the February 2026 AEB survey plan to grow in the next five years, and approximately 36% of respondents plan to bring another family member into the business in the next five years.

 


References

Langemeier, M., J. Minert, and J. Colussi. “Crop vs. Livestock Sentiment.” Center for Commercial Agriculture, Purdue University, October 6, 2025.

Langemeier, M. and J. Colussi. “Farmer Sentiment Rebounds, but Future Expectations Continue to Slide.” Ag Economy Barometer, March 3, 2026. (https://ag.purdue.edu/commercialag/ageconomybarometer/).

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Farmer Sentiment Rebounds, but Future Expectations Continue to Slide

March 3, 2026

Farmer sentiment improved in February as the Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer Index rose from 113 points in January to 116. The Current Conditions Index increased by 11 points, while the Future Expectations Index dropped 1 point. Although concerns about agricultural exports moderated somewhat from the previous month, they are still higher than those expressed in December. In addition, the percentage of respondents who think the U.S. is headed in the “right direction” declined for the second month in a row.

READ MORE

U.S. and Brazil Soybean Competitiveness: Farm-Level Costs and Returns

February 23, 2026

This article compares farm-level soybean costs and profitability in Iowa and Mato Grosso from 2020–2024. Brazilian farms face higher direct input costs, while U.S. farms carry heavier land-related overhead. Structural cost differences help explain Brazil’s sustained profitability and ongoing competitiveness in global soybean markets.

READ MORE

Farmer Sentiment Drops Sharply — What It Signals for Farm Finances in 2026

February 3, 2026

Farmer sentiment dropped sharply to start 2026, reflecting growing economic concerns across U.S. agriculture. But beyond the headline decline in

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

We are taking a short break, but please plan to join us at one of our future programs that is a little farther in the future.

2026 Crop Cost and Return Guide

September 16, 2025

The 2026 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide provides estimated costs and net returns for planting, growing, and harvesting corn, soybeans, and wheat in the upcoming year. Cost and return information presents information for low, average, and high productivity soils. Early projections point to slightly higher breakeven prices.

READ MORE

2025 Farmland Values & Market Trends

September 9, 2025

Purdue ag economists Todd Kuethe and Michael Langemeier as they discuss Indiana farmland values on this, the first of two episodes reviewing the 2025 Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rental Rates survey results. The survey shows Indiana land prices continue to rise and are anticipated to continue a modest increase for the rest of 2025 for most of the state.

READ MORE

Farmland Prices Increase Despite Downward Pressure, Purdue Ag Econ Report August 2025

August 19, 2025

Indiana farmland prices have continued the trend of record highs in 2025, according to the latest Purdue Farmland Value and Cash Rents Survey results. The average price of top-quality farmland reached $14,826 per acre, a 3.0% increase from June 2024. Statewide, cash rents increased from 1.5 to 1.7% for poor-, average-, and top-quality land.

READ MORE