Skip to Main Content

Study: Rural-urban fiscal divide grows in response to decades of state tax overhauls

In the early 2000s, Indiana started making significant changes to its local revenue policies — altering the way counties assess property value, capping property taxes, adding new local income tax options, and modifying school and road funding formulas. The changes have made providing basic local governmental services easier in rural counties, while putting more fiscal pressure on urban areas, according to a Purdue University economist’s report.

Larry DeBoer, a professor of agricultural economics, calculated each Indiana county’s capacity cost index, which considers the county’s particular tax base and potential state funding as well as its costs, including city and town population, school-age population, roads that must be maintained, and other basic needs. A positive index figure suggests that a county can provide those basic services with a lower tax rate. A negative index means counties must adopt higher tax rates to do so and may have trouble even then.

The report, “Capacity-Cost Indexes for Indiana Local Governments 2002 and 2018,” prepared for the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute, compares these indices across the state for 2002 and 2018. During that period, as tax codes changed, urban and rural areas diverged, with the urban negative ratings growing while rural areas became more positive.

The key differences, DeBoer said, are farmland values and changes in population levels. While urban areas and larger towns add population, they don’t increase their property tax bases at a proportional level. Farmland makes up the majority of taxable property in rural areas. Farmland assessments increased substantially after 2002, and are not affected when rural populations decline.

That’s a double-edged sword, however. Rising farmland values improve a rural county’s ability to fund its basic services, but they also mean that more tax burden is placed on the shoulders of farmers as their county population declines.

“Populations have been falling in many rural communities, but some baseline services don’t change with population. You still have to maintain roads, operate school buildings and pay for emergency services,” DeBoer said. “Costs per person go up when rural populations fall, but the farmland remains to be taxed, and we increased farmland assessments a lot in the past 20 years. But as those people move to cities and urban areas, they increase costs in those places without doing as much for expanding the tax base. That can make meeting basic needs more difficult.”

The introduction of large standard and supplemental homestead deductions further held back urban tax revenue growth. In those counties, new homes add to the tax base, but the homestead deductions limit the value for tax purposes.

“Places with faster growing populations experienced a drag on capacity growth from increasing homestead deductions,” according to the report.

Other finding included:

  • Counties that lose manufacturing jobs without replacing them in other areas had slow revenue capacity growth. Loss of population in those areas did not lead to proportional cost declines.
  • Growing urban areas with rising costs saw higher property tax rates. Higher rates triggered higher tax cap credits, which lowered the tax bills of residents and further eroded local revenues.
  • Rural counties experiencing population loss did not see costs drop proportionally. Some costs, such as those for roads, increased per capita. But farmland values pushed revenue capacity higher than costs. The state’s maximum tax levy limits required counties to reduce property tax rates, rather than increase spending.

The report was developed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing economic setbacks, and DeBoer said those issues will further reduce revenue capacity across the state. He projects declines in property values, lower taxable incomes and potential cuts to state school aid will make it more difficult for urban areas to cover service costs. 

“The COVID-19 recession will reduce the capacity of local governments in every Indiana county,” DeBoer wrote. “Those that are already struggling to deliver services with limited tax bases will be affected most harshly.”

Featured Stories

lab grown meat
Survey tallies consumer attitudes toward lab-grown meat alternatives

Many consumers view conventional meats as both tastier and healthier than laboratory-grown...

Read More
Against a black backdrop, three dozen egg carton are neatly arranged to surround many loose brown eggs
Butcher Block adds eggs from chickens fed orange corn

The Boilermaker Butcher Block’s selections will now include farm fresh eggs laid by Purdue...

Read More
Jingjing Liang stands tall in front of a wall of monitors showing pictures of different forests.
Scientists from dozens of countries coming to Purdue for forestry collaboration in Science-i Bridging Worlds Workshop

In the spirit of building a community to manage and protect the world’s forests, Liang and...

Read More
Julie Hickman stands in construction site with hard hat ready for work.
Behind the Research: Julie Hickman

Many people are involved in the remarkable range of programs, services and facilities that...

Read More
A landscape photo of a pond and the surrounding forest area at the Southeastern Purdue Agricultural Center where Dr. Bryan Pijanowski's lab has set up sensors and microphones to monitor wildlife before, during and after the solar eclipse.
Center for Global Soundscapes Study Will Record How Animals Respond to Solar Eclipse

The upcoming solar eclipse on April 8 has drawn the attention of scientists and the general...

Read More
Purdue College of Agriculture.
Farmer Sentiment Improves As Interest Rate Expectations Shift

U.S. farmers’ perspective on the future improved in March helping to push the Purdue...

Read More
To Top