June 1, 2015

Managing in Turbulent Times: Positioning to Capture the Upside, Buffer the Downside

Risk dominates the farming sector, and most farmers try to reduce or manage/mitigate the risks they take. Risk is perceived by most to be “bad” – – something to be avoided. But entrepreneurs and businessmen also know that without some risk, there likely is not much reward – – to obtain a reasonable return, you typically have to take some calculated risks. In fact “risk” or uncertainty has both an upside and a downside. The key management challenges are to make sure you are adequately rewarded for the risks you take; and to minimize the downside and capture the upside of the risks and uncertainties that you face or choose to take.

Certainly many of the operational and financial risks and uncertainties in farming can be managed or transferred to others through insurance or options and futures markets, but that is generally not the case with strategic risks. And often strategic risks or uncertainties provide significant opportunities for profits, so transferring them to others results in lost opportunity. So managing strategic risks requires a different approach – – recognizing and retaining the risk and positioning for the uncertainty. Successful positioning requires two attributes of a firm; 1) resiliency and absorptive capacity to handle the potential downside or negative consequences of an uncertainty, and 2) agility to detect and capture the potential upside or positive consequences of an uncertainty.

The absorptive capacity of a business or its resiliency to downside risk or uncertainty is impacted by a number of features or characteristics.

  1. Low fixed costs – These can help a firm weather a wide range of changes, such as price wars, higher raw material costs, and declining demand.
  2. War chest of cash – Cash is perfectly fungible, so it can be deployed against future contingencies that managers cannot foresee.
  3. Diversified cash flow – Companies can withstand downturns in specific units, and diversified units serve as a store of potential wealth that can be sold later.
  4. Too big to fail – Large firms can survive by off-loading operations and reducing head count in crises. Size also increases the odds the government, customers, or suppliers will prop up an ailing firm.
  5. Tangible resources – Valuable resources such as raw material deposits, real estate, and so on serve as a store of potential value.
  6. Intangible resources – Brand expertise, and technology can insulate the firm against changes in the market in the short and medium term.
  7. Customer lock-in – Switching costs prevent customers from easily jumping ship, buying a firm time when circumstances shift.
  8. Protected core market – Barriers to entry in a core market provide a safe stream of cash to weather storms.
  9. Powerful patron – A powerful government, regulator, customer, or investor vested in the firm’s success can buffer it from changes.
  10. Excess staff – The corporate equivalent of body fat, these employees serve as a store of value that can be shed in hard times.

Note that most of these sources of absorption/resiliency are not just happenstance or
predetermined, they are a function of conscious decisions to accomplish a specific goal or objective – – to position the business so that it can accommodate and absorb the unfortunate events it might encounter.

Critical characteristics or sources of agility that enable a business to capture the upside of risk and uncertainty; include the following:

  1. Strategic
    • A strong balance sheet and a large war chest to finance big bets
    • A governance structure that permits executives to seize opportunities more quickly than
      rivals
    • Owners and executives with a long-term perspective
    • Early recognition of market changes
    • Willingness to exit
    • Start-up/new venture mentality
  2. Portfolio
    • A diversified portfolio of independent units
    • A cadre of general managers who can be transferred across units
    • Central corporate control over-important resources, such as talent and cash so they can be
      reallocated
    • Regular, unbiased evaluation processes
    • Structured processes for decreasing investments or selling off units
  3. Operational
    • Shared real-time market data that are granular and credible
    • A small number of corporate priorities to focus effort
    • Clear performance goals for teams and individuals
    • Mechanisms to hold people accountable and to reward them
    • Again, conscious management decisions can enhance this capability to capture future
      opportunities.

Figure 1 provides an assessment tool that can be used to evaluate the skills of the manager and capacity of the firm to have the resiliency to absorb the potential downside and agility to capture the potential upside of the uncertainty in farming

Figure 1. Assessing Absorption Capacity and Agility

Figure 1. Assessing Absorption Capacity and Agility*

 


*Sull, Donald, The Upside of Turbulence: Seizing Opportunity in an Uncertain World, Donald Sull.–1st edition. 2009.

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Financial Stress on Crop Farms: Who Is Most at Risk in the 2024–26 Downturn?

September 3, 2025

Midwest crop producers have experienced a significant downturn in corn, soybean, and wheat prices since late 2023, resulting in a drop in net returns in 2024. Moreover, current expectations are that prices will continue to remain at or below the cost of production for at least a couple more years. Consequently, a key question being asked is as follows: “Who is the most vulnerable financially during this downturn”?

READ MORE

Adoption of Conservation Practices and Farm Goals

July 29, 2025

How do farm goals shape conservation decisions? This analysis draws on a nationwide survey of 400 producers to explore how priorities like profitability, risk, and sustainability impact the adoption of practices like no-till, cover crops, and crop diversification. Farmers who rank conservation as a top goal are significantly more likely to implement these practices—offering a window into what drives long-term thinking in farm management.

READ MORE

Farm Goals

July 23, 2025

One-third of recently surveyed farmers identified farm transfer as their top goal, but priorities like profit, conservation, debt reduction, and income stability also ranked high. The study reveals that most farms pursue a mix of goals, and understanding the tradeoffs between them can lead to better long-term business decisions. Take time to define your farm’s goals—and use them to shape long-term business decisions.

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

Purdue Flexible Lease Workshop

September 16 at 7 pm or September 23 at 9 am

The Flexible Lease virtual Workshop, presented by the Purdue Extension Land Lease Team, will include a presentation and discussion to help you decide if a flexible land lease arrangement is right for your farm.

Read More

2026 Crop Cost and Return Guide

September 16, 2025

The 2026 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide provides estimated costs and net returns for planting, growing, and harvesting corn, soybeans, and wheat in the upcoming year. Cost and return information presents information for low, average, and high productivity soils. Early projections point to slightly higher breakeven prices.

READ MORE

2025 Farmland Values & Market Trends

September 9, 2025

Purdue ag economists Todd Kuethe and Michael Langemeier as they discuss Indiana farmland values on this, the first of two episodes reviewing the 2025 Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rental Rates survey results. The survey shows Indiana land prices continue to rise and are anticipated to continue a modest increase for the rest of 2025 for most of the state.

READ MORE

Farmland Prices Increase Despite Downward Pressure, Purdue Ag Econ Report August 2025

August 19, 2025

Indiana farmland prices have continued the trend of record highs in 2025, according to the latest Purdue Farmland Value and Cash Rents Survey results. The average price of top-quality farmland reached $14,826 per acre, a 3.0% increase from June 2024. Statewide, cash rents increased from 1.5 to 1.7% for poor-, average-, and top-quality land.

READ MORE