March 2, 2017

Net Return Prospects for Cattle Finishing in 2017

With the exception of May 2016, monthly fed cattle net returns were negative during 2015 and 2016. Current prospects for 2017 appear much brighter. In addition to discussing net return prospects for cattle finishing in 2017, this article discusses trends in feeding cost of gain and the feeder to fed price ratio.

Several data sources were used to compute net returns. Average daily gain, feed conversion, days on feed, in weight, out weight, and feeding cost of gain were obtained from monthly issues of the Focus on Feedlots newsletter. Futures prices for corn and seasonal feed conversion rates were used to project feeding cost of gain for the next several months. Net returns were computed using feeding cost of gain from monthly issues of the Focus on Feedlots newsletter, fed cattle prices and feeder cattle prices reported by the Livestock Marketing Information Center (LMIC), and interest rates from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

A recent farmdoc article discussed the importance of feeding cost of gain and the feeder to fed price ratio to cattle finishing net returns. Given this importance, we discuss trends in feeding cost of gain and the feeder to fed price ratio before elaborating on net return prospects. Figure 1 illustrates monthly feeding cost of gain from January 2007 to January 2017. Feeding cost of gain averaged $85.16 per cwt. in 2015 and $77.20 per cwt. in 2016. In December of 2016 and January 2017, feeding cost of gain was approximately $70 per cwt. Given current corn and alfalfa price projections, feeding cost of gain is expected to range from $65 to $70 for the rest of 2017.

Figure 1. Feeding Cost of Gain for Steers, Kansas

Figure 1. Feeding Cost of Gain for Steers, Kansas

The ratio of feeder to fed cattle prices for the last ten years is illustrated in figure 2. During the ten-year period, this ratio averaged 1.19. The feeder to fed price ratio was one standard deviation below (above) this average for 11 (19) months during the ten-year period. The average net return for the months in which the ratio was below one standard deviation of the average was $80 per head. In contrast, the average loss for the months in which the ratio was above one standard deviation was $250 per head. Of the 19 months with a ratio above one standard deviation of the average feeder to fed price ratio, 17 of these months have occurred since January 2015. Now comes the good news. Given current price projections, the feeder to fed price ratio is expected to remain at or below the ten-year average for the rest of 2017. For February, March, and April, the feeder to fed price ratio is expected to remain below 1.15. These relatively low ratios, along with relatively low expected feeding cost of gain, improve net return prospects for these months. Of course, an unexpected drop in fed cattle prices, as occurred from August to December of 2015, and from August to October of 2016 would create a spike in the price ratio.

Figure 2. Ratio of Feeder Prices to Fed Cattle Prices, Kansas

Figure 2. Ratio of Feeder Prices to Fed Cattle Prices, Kansas

Monthly steer finishing net returns from January 2007 to January 2017 are presented in Figure 3. It is important to note that net returns were computed using closeout months rather than placement months. Average losses in 2016 were $126 per head, and ranged from a loss $362 per head in January to a net return of $57 per head in May. Net return per head for January 2017 was approximately $40. Historical and breakeven prices for the last ten years, as well as projected breakeven prices for the rest of 2017, are illustrated in figure 4. Breakeven prices for February through June are expected to range from $106 to $110 per cwt. For the last six months of the year, breakeven prices are expected to range from $105 to $108 per cwt. Current fed cattle price projections suggest that the breakeven prices indicated above could result in at least modest net returns for most of 2017. Consistent with the relatively low expected feeder to fed price ratios noted above, the highest net returns are expected for March, April, and May closeouts.

Figure 3. Historical Net Returns for Finishing Steers, Kansas

Figure 3. Historical Net Returns for Finishing Steers, Kansas

Figure 4. Fed Cattle and Breakeven Prices, Kansas

Figure 4. Fed Cattle and Breakeven Prices, Kansas

This article discussed recent trends in feeding cost of gain, the feeder to fed price ratio, and cattle finishing net returns. Current breakeven and fed cattle price projections create an environment that is at a minimum cautiously optimistic. After a disastrous 2015 and 2016, this is certainly welcome news. The strongest prospects for positive net returns in 2017 are associated with March through May closeouts.

Citations

Focus on Feedlots, Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, www.asi.k-state.edu/about/newsletters/focus-on-feedlots​, accessed March 1, 2017.

Langemeier, M. “Impact of Lower Corn Prices on Feeding Cost of Gain and Cattle Finishing Net Returns.” farmdoc daily (6):193, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, October 13, 2016.

Livestock Marketing Information Center, www.lmic.info/, accessed March 1, 2017.

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Impact of Higher Corn Prices on Feeding Cost of Gain and Net Returns for Cattle Finishing

April 28, 2022

Given that the U.S. stocks to use ratio is currently only 9.6 percent and continued questions related to U.S. corn acreage in 2022, there is tremendous uncertainty regarding corn prices for the rest of this year. To address this uncertainty, this article examines the impact of relatively high corn prices on feeding cost of gain and net returns for cattle finishing.

READ MORE

Cattle Finishing Net Returns Prospects for 2022

January 7, 2022

Due to relatively strong fed cattle prices, cattle finishing net returns ended 2021 on a positive note.  Will these positive net returns continue into 2022?  This article examines feeding cost of gain, breakeven prices, and net return estimates for 2021, and provides projections for the first half of 2022.

READ MORE

Factors Impacting Feeding Cost of Gain

November 22, 2021

Purdue ag economist Michael Langemeier discusses the key factors impacting feeding cost of gain in commercial feedlots.

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

Monthly Corn & Soybean Outlook Webinar Series

Webinar each month following USDA’s release of the updated World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE). Catch the next monthly update October 14th for the corn and soybean outlook following release of USDA’s October Crop Production and World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) reports. Registration is free.

Read More

September Corn & Soybean Outlook Update

September 16, 2022

Recorded September 16 | Purdue ag economists discussed USDA’s September Crop Production and World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) reports.

READ MORE

Comparing Net Returns for Alternative Leasing Agreements

September 2, 2022

Obtaining control of land through leasing has a long history in the United States.  Leases on agricultural land are strongly influenced by local custom and tradition.  However, in most areas, landowners and operators can choose from several types of lease arrangements.  With crop share arrangements, crop production and often government payments and crop insurance indemnity payments are shared between the landowner and operator.  These arrangements also involve the sharing of at least a portion of crop expenses.  Fixed cash rent arrangements, as the name implies, provide landowners with a fixed payment per year.  Flexible cash lease arrangements provide a base cash rent plus a bonus which typically represents a share of gross revenue in excess of a certain base value.  Each leasing arrangement has advantages and disadvantages.

READ MORE

Indiana Farmland Prices Grow at Record Pace in 2022

August 10, 2022

It is safe to say that the last year was unlike any other in recent memory. The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to our lives and the global economy. Surprisingly, many of the current economic forces put upward pressure on farmland prices.

READ MORE