September 3, 2019

International Differences in Labor Efficiency and Productivity

by Michael Langemeier and Rachel Purdy

Examining the competitiveness of crop production in different regions of the world is often difficult due to lack of comparable data and agreement regarding what needs to be measured.  To be useful, international data needs to be expressed in common production units and converted to a common currency.  Also, production and cost measures need to be consistently defined across production regions or farms.

This paper examines differences in labor efficiency and productivity using 2013 to 2017 data from the agri benchmark network.  Discussion of key labor benchmarks used in production agriculture can be found in Langemeier (2017, 2018a, 2018b).  Labor efficiency is computed by dividing total labor cost (hired labor plus family and operator labor) by gross revenue.  Labor productivity is computed by dividing gross revenue by the number of workers.  In this paper, labor productivity is expressed on a per hectare basis.

The agri benchmark network collects data on beef, cash crops, dairy, pigs and poultry, horticulture, and organic products.  There are 40 countries represented in the cash crop network.  The agri benchmark concept of typical farms was developed to understand and compare current farm production systems around the world.  Participant countries follow a standard procedure to create typical farms that are representative of national farm output shares and categorized by production system or combination of enterprises and structural features.

Data from typical farms with corn and soybean enterprise data, and corn and wheat enterprise data are used in this paper.  It is important to note that corn, soybean, and wheat enterprise data is collected from other countries besides those represented in this paper.  For more information, visit the agri benchmark website (here).

The farm and country abbreviations used in this paper are listed in table 1.  While the farms may produce a variety of crops, this paper only considers corn, soybean, and wheat production.  Typical farms used in the agri benchmark network are defined using country initials and hectares on the farm.  For example, the US1215INC farm is located in the central Indiana and has 1215 hectares.

Table 1. Abbreviations for Sample of Typical Farms with Corn, Soybean, or both Corn and Soybean Enterprises.

Table 1. Abbreviations for Sample of Typical Farms with Corn, Soybean, or both Corn and Soybean Enterprises.

Corn and Soybeans

Figure 1 presents labor efficiency for typical farms in the agri benchmark network that produced both corn and soybeans during the 2013 to 2017 period and figure 2 presents labor productivity for these same farms.  The farms denoted with the green diamond were cost efficient which means that these farms produced the most output for a given level of inputs and utilized the optimal mix of inputs.  Farms depicted with a blue triangle were cost inefficient and had relatively high per unit costs compared to the cost efficient farms.

Figure 1. Labor Efficiency, agribenchmark Typical Farms Corn/Soybean Enterprises

Figure 1. Labor Efficiency, agribenchmark Typical Farms, Corn/Soybean Enterprises

Figure 2. Labor Productivity, agribenchmark Typical Farms Corn/Soybean Enterprises

Figure 2. Labor Productivity, agribenchmark Typical Farms, Corn/Soybean Enterprises

Labor efficiency for the corn and soybean farms ranged from less than 2 percent for the farms in Argentina and Uruguay to over 18 percent for the South African farm, and averaged 6.5 percent.  The low measures for the farms from Argentina and Uruguay partially result from the large use of custom operations on these farms.  The average labor efficiency for the four U.S. farms was 6.7 percent.

Labor productivity for the corn and soybean farms averaged $1,065 per hectare, and ranged from $12 for the South African farm to over $3,500 for the largest farm in Argentina and the largest farm in Uruguay.  The average measure for the four U.S. farms was $358 per hectare.

Farms that are cost efficient are producing the highest level of output for a given level of inputs, and using the optimal mix of inputs.  Surprisingly, labor efficiency and productivity were not significantly correlated with cost efficiency.  Perhaps this is due to the wide variability of these measures among the cost efficient farms.

Corn and Wheat

Figures 3 and 4 present labor efficiency and productivity for typical farms in the agri benchmark network that produced corn and wheat during the 2013 to 2017 period.  The farms denoted with a green diamond were cost efficient while the farms denoted with a black triangle were cost inefficient.

Figure 3. Labor Efficiency, agribenchmark Typical Farms Corn/Wheat Enterprises

Figure 3. Labor Efficiency, agribenchmark Typical Farms, Corn/Wheat Enterprises

Figure 4. Labor Productivity, agribenchmark Typical Farms Corn/Wheat Enterprises

Figure 4. Labor Productivity, agribenchmark Typical Farms, Corn/Wheat Enterprises

Labor efficiency for the corn and wheat farms ranged from less than 2 percent for the farms in Argentina and Uruguay to over 23 percent for one of the French farms, and averaged 9.2 percent.  The low measures for the farms from Argentina and Uruguay partially result from the large use of custom operations on these farms.  The average labor efficiency for the three U.S. farms was 7.2 percent.

Labor productivity for the corn and wheat farms averaged $556 per hectare, and ranged from less than $25 for the South African farm and the smallest Brazilian farm to $3,400 for the largest farm in Argentina.  The average measure for the three U.S. farms was $326 per hectare.

Labor efficiency was negatively correlated with cost efficiency and labor productivity was positively correlated with cost efficiency.  This indicates that typical farms with relatively lower labor cost in relation to gross revenue and relatively higher gross revenue per worker tended to be more cost efficient.

Conclusions

This paper examined differences in labor efficiency and productivity for typical farms in in the agri benchmark network.  Labor efficiency and productivity varied widely among the typical farms.  Differences in these measures across farms that were cost efficient is particularly noteworthy, and suggest that typical farms in different countries adjust their use of labor in response to differences in wage rates and productivity.

The results for the U.S. farms are consistent with those reported in Langemeier (2018b).  Average labor efficiency for these farms was 6.5 percent for corn and soybean production, and 6.8 percent for corn and wheat production.  Labor productivity, measured by dividing gross revenue per hectare by the number of workers, averaged $358 for the U.S. corn and soybean farms and $326 for the U.S. corn and wheat farms.

References

Agri benchmarkhttp://www.agribenchmark.org/home.html.  Retrieved on 8/20/19.

Langemeier, M. “Benchmarking Labor Efficiency and Productivity.” Center for Commercial Agriculture, Purdue University, September 2017.

Langemeier, M. “How Can I Improve Labor Productivity?” Center for Commercial Agriculture, Purdue University, September 2018a.

Langemeier, M. “Labor Efficiency and Productivity Benchmarks.” Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. 81(2018b):17-28.

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Projected Net Income per Acre for West Central Indiana Case Farm

September 10, 2025

For a state such as Indiana, which is heavily reliant on corn and soybean receipts, the latest USDA-ERS net farm income forecast seems counter-intuitive. After two strong net farm income years in 2021 and 2022, net farm income has been below average for crop farms. Current projections for 2025 and 2026 suggest that net farm income will remain below average through at least 2026.

READ MORE

Crop Net Return Prospects, Presentation at Pinney Purdue Field Day

August 20, 2025

Michael Langemeier presented at the Pinney Purdue Field Day in Wanatah, Indiana on August 20, 2025, on crop net returns and the farmland market.

READ MORE

Corn & Soybean Basis Weakens as Focus Shifts to New Crop

August 15, 2025

On Tuesday, the August WASDE report was released, which significantly increased the projected 25/26 corn supply and decreased the soybean supply. There were immediate effects in the futures market. September and December corn futures dropped by $0.13/bu, and September and November soybean futures increased by $0.21/bu. As we approach harvest, it is yet to be seen how this will affect the new crop basis.

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

Purdue Flexible Lease Workshop

September 16 at 7 pm or September 23 at 9 am

The Flexible Lease virtual Workshop, presented by the Purdue Extension Land Lease Team, will include a presentation and discussion to help you decide if a flexible land lease arrangement is right for your farm.

Read More

2025 Farmland Values & Market Trends

September 9, 2025

Purdue ag economists Todd Kuethe and Michael Langemeier as they discuss Indiana farmland values on this, the first of two episodes reviewing the 2025 Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rental Rates survey results. The survey shows Indiana land prices continue to rise and are anticipated to continue a modest increase for the rest of 2025 for most of the state.

READ MORE

Farmland Prices Increase Despite Downward Pressure, Purdue Ag Econ Report August 2025

August 19, 2025

Indiana farmland prices have continued the trend of record highs in 2025, according to the latest Purdue Farmland Value and Cash Rents Survey results. The average price of top-quality farmland reached $14,826 per acre, a 3.0% increase from June 2024. Statewide, cash rents increased from 1.5 to 1.7% for poor-, average-, and top-quality land.

READ MORE

2025 Indiana Farm Custom Rates

April 17, 2025

The rates reported in this publication were compiled from questionnaires received from farmers, farm owners, farm custom operators, and professional farm managers in Indiana during the last month of 2024 and the first three months of 2025. Respondents were asked to report custom rates they had either paid or received during the past year.

READ MORE