Analysis: Wind energy expansion would have $27 billion economic impact

Wind, which generates less greenhouse gas emission than burning fossil fuels, is making up an increasing share of the energy production portfolio in the United States. But wind is not as efficient as coal or natural gas, causing some concern about its economic impact.

A Purdue University study that models increased wind production in 10 states shows significant economic impact in those states, as well as billions of dollars spread over the rest of the country. Led by Shweta Singh, an assistant professor in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering and in Environmental and Ecological Engineering, a stand-alone academic unit in the College of Engineering, with colleagues at the University of Sydney, the results were published in the March issue of the journal Applied Energy.

“While the impacts are directly felt in the state experiencing the increase in economic activities due to installation of new wind energy generation capacity, the positive economic effects also spill over as shown by the MRIO calculations,” the authors wrote.

The analysis considers the effects of adding 500 megawatts each in 10 different states that produce the most wind energy in the U.S. — Texas, Iowa, Oklahoma, California, Kansas, Illinois, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington and Colorado. The result would be almost $24 billion in economic impact in those states, as well as an additional $3 billion throughout the rest of the United States.

“In states that get new wind energy capacity, we see significant economic impact, but there is also $3 billion that spills over into the other states because there is so much interdependency on products being manufactured there,” Singh said.

The U.S. currently has more than 100,000 MW of operating wind capacity, according to the American Wind Energy Association. Adding 500 MW in 10 states would be only a 5% increase but would have significant economic benefits.

Expansion of wind power in the top 10 wind-producing states would create billions of dollars of economic impact. States that add wind power would see about $24 billion in activity, while other states would see $3 billion in spillover economic activity. (Photos provided by Shweta Singh) , opens larger image Expansion of wind power in the top 10 wind-producing states would create billions of dollars of economic impact. States that add wind power would see about $24 billion in activity, while other states would see $3 billion in spillover economic activity. (Photos provided by Shweta Singh)

Graduate student Gargyea Vunnava’s analysis was developed using a new USA multi-region input output (MRIO) model that considers how a shock affects not just one segment of the economy, but many interconnected parts and regions. A U.S. MRIO lab has been developed in Singh’s lab using the Industrial Ecology Virtual Lab infrastructure created at the University of Sydney. This is the first MRIO lab created for the United States.

The sectors that would see the most economic benefit would be manufacturing, construction, finance and insurance, transportation and warehousing, and public administration.

“We are so dependent on coal energy because the infrastructure has been built and it’s so cheap,” Singh said. “But this study shows that there is significant economic opportunity from increasing wind energy production, as well as spillover that touches every state and many employment sectors along with long-term impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

The Purdue Research Foundation funded this research.

Expansion of wind power in the top 10 wind-producing states would create billions of dollars of economic impact. States that add wind power would see about $24 billion in activity, while other states would see $3 billion in spillover economic activity. (Photos provided by Shweta Singh) , opens larger image Expansion of wind power in the top 10 wind-producing states would create billions of dollars of economic impact. States that add wind power would see about $24 billion in activity, while other states would see $3 billion in spillover economic activity. (Photos provided by Shweta Singh)

Featured Stories

OISC logo
Indiana residents warned about illegal pesticide product

The Office of Indiana State Chemist (OISC) is warning Indiana residents about an illegal...

Read More
Samples under preparation in a research lab.
Study details surprising human immune cell link to HIV

A prominent protein on most human cells may be key to unlocking the code that makes humans...

Read More
Ava Hoskins paints a pot; Ava leads a group of campers on a walk through the stream.
FNR Field Report - Ava Hoskins

Ava Hoskins, a double major in aquatic sciences (fisheries concentration) and natural resources...

Read More
Ashlynn McLaughlin cleans a coral nursery tree; McLaughlin picking up trash on the beach on World Ocean's Day.
FNR Field Report - Ashlynn McLaughlin

Ashlynn McLaughlin, a senior aquatic sciences major with a concentration in marine and freshwater...

Read More
Brody Cox poses with arms crossed in front of Pfendler Hall
From Indiana 4-H to Purdue Agriculture

For Brody Cox, preparing for the Indiana State Fair began long before he entered the show...

Read More
Carolyn Foley leads a Great Lakes focus group in 2011; Foley on a boat with a University of Michigan student
FNR Remembers Carolyn Foley, Names Great Lakes Research Award

Carolyn Foley, a long-time member of the Purdue Forestry and Natural Resources (FNR) and...

Read More