September 13, 2014

Estimating the Cost for Drying Corn

*Content via Iowa State’s Ag Decision Maker website.

Climate conditions in the upper Midwest states make it necessary for most of the corn harvested for grain there to be dried artificially, to some extent. The cost of drying corn grain will depend on the type and size of drying system utilized, the amount of moisture to be removed, the weather conditions during the drying period, and the current per unit costs for electricity and drying fuel.

Depreciation and Interest

The initial investment cost of a drying system includes the purchase price of the drying unit itself plus any needed augers, wiring, concrete and other amenities. Their total cost should be amortized over the expected life of the system. Converting the up-front investment into a series of payments provides an estimate of the annual cost of the system. It is equivalent to repaying a 100 percent loan over the life of the system, or placing funds into a savings account each year to replace the system at the end of its life. This annual “payment” includes both depreciation and interest costs in a single value.

table 1A useful life of 20 to 25 years is reasonable for a grain drying system, although many systems provide service for longer periods. The interest rate used can be the current rate charged on long-term farm equipment loans, or an average of the borrowing rate and the rate that could be earned on the farm’s equity capital. The annual payment can be estimated from loan amortization factor tables, or by using the “payment” function in a financial calculator or an electronic spreadsheet. AgDM Decision Tool A2-31, Comparison of Drying Systems, can be used to estimate the value for a specific situation.

Repair and Maintenance Costs

The cost of performing annual maintenance and fixing or replacing components in a drying system is usually relatively low. Hellevang and Reff suggested using 3 percent of the initial investment cost as an estimate of annual repair and maintenance costs. However, this will vary with the amount of use the system has each year.

Fuel Cost

The amount of fuel used to dry grain will vary widely with the type of system employed. Shouse, Hanna and Petersen suggest an average consumption of .018 gallons of liquid propane (LP) fuel for each percentage point of moisture removed from a bushel of corn for high-temperature drying systems, with a range of .010 to .025 gallons. The assumed usage rate is multiplied by the number of points of moisture to be removed from each bushel, then by the number of bushels to be dried, then finally by the price per gallon of LP gas.

table 2

Electricity Cost

Most drying systems also use electricity to power fans, move grain and in some cases provide heat. Shouse, Hanna and Peterson estimate an average electricity usage of 0.01 kilowatt-hour (kWh) per point of moisture removed per bushel for high-temperature systems. For natural air drying systems, which use only electricity, they estimate an average usage rate of 0.33 kWh per point removed, with a range of 0.30 to 0.40 kWh. The assumed usage rate is multiplied by the number of points of moisture to be removed from each bushel, then by the number of bushels to be dried, then finally by the price per kWh of electricity.

Handling and Labor

Moving grain into and out of the drying system generally requires some power cost, whether electrical or by mechanical means, though the cost is usually small. A nominal estimate of $.01 per bushel can be used.

The amount of labor needed to operate a drying system will vary considerably with the type of system. A high-temperature, fast-drying system may require frequent monitoring, while a slower system may need to be checked much less often. The labor cost per bushel dried can be estimated by dividing a typical farm labor wage rate per hour by the number of bushels typically dried in an hour by the system, then multiplying by the percent of the total drying time that labor is needed.

Total Cost

The total of annual depreciation and interest, plus maintenance and repair costs can be divided by the number of bushels dried annually to estimate a fixed cost per bushel. This value can be added to the cost per bushel for labor and handling. Dividing this total by the number of points of moisture typically removed provides an estimate of cost per point. This can be added to the cost per point for fuel and electricity to find a total cost per point of moisture removed. This value can be used to compare among different drying systems, or to a commercial drying charge. By far the largest cost components for drying grain will be fuel and/or electricity, so these costs should receive the most attention when estimating total costs.






Hellevang, K., and Tommy Reff. “Calculating Grain Drying Cost.” AE-923, North Dakota State University Extension Service, April 1987.

Nichols, T.E. “Economics of On-Farm Corn Drying.” NCH-21, National Corn Handbook, May 1985.

Shouse, Shawn, Mark Hanna and Dana Petersen. “Managing High-Temperature Grain Dryers for Energy Efficiency.” PM 2089f, Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, May 2010.

Shouse, Shawn, Mark Hanna and Dana Petersen. “Energy Considerations for Low-temperature Grain Drying.” PM 2089u, Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, May 2012.




Crop Basis Tool

January 17, 2023

The Purdue Center for Commercial Agriculture Crop Basis Tool is a web-based tool that provides access to weekly historical and contemporaneous corn and soybean basis data for local market regions in the eastern corn belt.


January Corn & Soybean Outlook Update

January 13, 2023

Nathan Thompson and Michael Langemeier joined James Mintert on this podcast to discuss new information from USDA’s January 2023 World Ag Supply & Demand Estimates (WASDE) report, which was released on January 12th. During the podcast they also provided an update on Eastern Corn Belt corn and soybean basis bids, marketing opportunities for both old and new crop corn and soybeans along with current breakeven estimates for corn and soybean production in 2023.


2023 Crop Cost and Return Guide

January 13, 2023

The Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide offers farmers a resource to project financials for the coming cropping year. These are the January 2023 crop budget estimations for 2023.



Farming Together: Cultivating Relationships and Having the Cash to Bring in the Next Generation

Where do you begin if you’re looking to transfer your farm to the next generation? Before starting with a legal entity, it’s important to come together and establish common goals and a direction for where you picture your operation moving in the future. Our Farming Together workshop will help you begin discussions to lead you to a successful transition.

Read More

Commodity Classic 2023

The Purdue University Center for Commercial Agriculture will present a Learning Center Session on Thursday, March 9 entitled Financial and Risk Management Strategies for 2023, at Commodity Classic in Orlando, Florida.

Read More

Monthly Corn & Soybean Outlook Update

Webinar each month following USDA’s release of the updated World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE). Catch the next monthly update on February 9 for the corn and soybean outlook following release of USDA’s February Crop Production and World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) reports. Registration is free.

Read More

2023 Crop Cost and Return Guide

January 13, 2023

The Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide offers farmers a resource to project financials for the coming cropping year. These are the January 2023 crop budget estimations for 2023.


December Corn & Soybean Outlook Update

December 19, 2022

Recorded December 19 | Purdue ag economists discuss a longer-term view of the changing cost structure facing corn and soybean prices, key factors likely to impact corn and soybean prices in 2023 and discussed how to use scenario’s when analyzing price risk and making marketing decisions.


Comparing Net Returns for Alternative Leasing Agreements

September 2, 2022

Obtaining control of land through leasing has a long history in the United States.  Leases on agricultural land are strongly influenced by local custom and tradition.  However, in most areas, landowners and operators can choose from several types of lease arrangements.  With crop share arrangements, crop production and often government payments and crop insurance indemnity payments are shared between the landowner and operator.  These arrangements also involve the sharing of at least a portion of crop expenses.  Fixed cash rent arrangements, as the name implies, provide landowners with a fixed payment per year.  Flexible cash lease arrangements provide a base cash rent plus a bonus which typically represents a share of gross revenue in excess of a certain base value.  Each leasing arrangement has advantages and disadvantages.