February 8, 2018

How Are You Deploying Farm Profits?

While the tight farm economy has many farmers focused on generating profits, it is also important to consider how profits, regardless of how small, are being deployed. How a farm deploys, or distributes, profits across current and non-current assets can be an important consideration, especially when financial conditions are tight.

As a quick review, a farm’s annual profits result in an increase to the farm’s equity position on the balance sheet. This equity can have two forms: non-current or current.

Non-Current Equity

Profits deployed to non-current equity can be used to 1) purchased non-current assets or 2) pay down non-current debt. Non-current assets can include equipment, buildings, grain bins, or farmland. In farming, it is common for producers to deploy profits to non-current assets by purchasing equipment. Tax-saving strategies, such as accelerated depreciation and Section 179, can make this very a valuable strategy.

The challenge with deploying profits to non-current assets (or equity) is that these assets are, by definition, less liquid. This makes the equity harder to tap into, or access, in the event of a future hiccup or tight-year. Furthermore, profits deployed to purchasing machinery are subject to deprecation over time.

Current Equity

Profits deployed to current equity can be 1) increases in current assets or 2) used to pay-down current debt. Increases in current assets often take the form of increased grain/livestock inventories or prepaying expenses for the upcoming year. Another form of current assets is cash-on-hand or savings.

What makes current assets attractive is that they are, typically, readily available to deploy. If 2018 turns out to be a difficult financial year, grain stored and held over from 2017 can be sold to meet the farm’s financial obligations. Even in good times, current assets – especially cash – can be used to take advantage of good opportunities that might come along.

Warren Buffet, who is known for keeping large piles of cash handy at all times, likes to call his cash an “elephant gun.”

The challenge with current assets is that they rarely generate a strong rate of return. Over the long-run, cash in the bank will generate a much smaller return than what a farm might generate from farmland. Furthermore, it is not helping generating revenue, like equipment or other farm capital assets. Other forms of current assets, such as stored grain, could be subject to large swings in values if unpriced.

Maintaining a War Chest

Building and maintaining a war chest of current assets can be helpful in two ways. First, it can help absorb financial blows from the uncertainties of production agriculture. Second, it can add flexibility for farms looking to seize good opportunities that might come along.

On the other hand, a large holding of current assets – especially cash – could limit a farm’s growth over the long-run.

Each farm’s preference for allocating profits to non-current and current assets (or equity) will vary, but this is a topic that management teams should regularly consider and discuss. Both have advantages and disadvantages. In today’s financial climate, producers should carefully manage this distribution process and carefully monitor their current assets.

 

This topic was part of a broader presentation by the author, Dr. Michael Langemeier, and Dr. Jim Mintert at the 2018 Purdue Top Farmer Conference.

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Decomposition of Statement of Cash Flows

June 5, 2025

Cash flow trends from 2007 to 2024 show how crop farms rely on operating income and borrowed funds to drive growth through asset purchases. As income levels shift, so do investment decisions—offering key insights for managing through expected challenges in 2025.

READ MORE

Decomposition of Changes in Net Worth

May 22, 2025

There are three major changes that contribute to an increase or decrease in net worth: change in retained earnings, change in contributed capital, and change in market valuation. Tracking changes in net worth over time is one of the most important tasks of those in charge of analyzing a farm’s financial position and performance.

READ MORE

Financial & Risk Management Strategies for 2023 at Commodity Classic

March 10, 2023

Purdue ag economists James Mintert & Michael Langemeier shared key lessons from 2022 and help producers plan for the financial and risk management realities of 2023. Live from Orlando, Florida at the 2023 Commodity Classic Learning Center Session on March 9, 2023.

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

Purdue Flexible Lease Workshop

September 16 at 7 pm or September 23 at 9 am

The Flexible Lease virtual Workshop, presented by the Purdue Extension Land Lease Team, will include a presentation and discussion to help you decide if a flexible land lease arrangement is right for your farm.

Read More

2026 Crop Cost and Return Guide

September 16, 2025

The 2026 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide provides estimated costs and net returns for planting, growing, and harvesting corn, soybeans, and wheat in the upcoming year. Cost and return information presents information for low, average, and high productivity soils. Early projections point to slightly higher breakeven prices.

READ MORE

2025 Farmland Values & Market Trends

September 9, 2025

Purdue ag economists Todd Kuethe and Michael Langemeier as they discuss Indiana farmland values on this, the first of two episodes reviewing the 2025 Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rental Rates survey results. The survey shows Indiana land prices continue to rise and are anticipated to continue a modest increase for the rest of 2025 for most of the state.

READ MORE

Farmland Prices Increase Despite Downward Pressure, Purdue Ag Econ Report August 2025

August 19, 2025

Indiana farmland prices have continued the trend of record highs in 2025, according to the latest Purdue Farmland Value and Cash Rents Survey results. The average price of top-quality farmland reached $14,826 per acre, a 3.0% increase from June 2024. Statewide, cash rents increased from 1.5 to 1.7% for poor-, average-, and top-quality land.

READ MORE