October 2, 2020

Evaluating New Ventures and Enterprises

by: Michael Langemeier

Uncertainty is pervasive in today’s business environment.  For example, corn prices have followed a roller coaster this year.  The nearby corn futures prices went from $3.90 in late January to $3.10 in early August, and then back to $3.80 in late September.  Relatively low long-run price prospects have led many producers to seek out alternative enterprise opportunities.  It is always important to remember that uncertainty creates opportunities.  This leads us to the following question.  What factors should be considered when evaluating a new venture or enterprise?  This article briefly discusses some of the most pertinent factors that need to be considered when evaluating strategic options.

Converting a portion of a farm’s acreage to organic crop production will be used as an example in the discussion below.  Other examples of new ventures or enterprises are as follows: hemp production, canola production, production of non-GMO crops, and production of specialty crops such as white corn, waxy corn, sweet corn, tomatoes, and potatoes.  Obviously, some of these ventures and enterprises would require a more detailed analysis than some of the other examples.

Reasons Why Businesses Fail

New ventures or enterprises often involve a major change or expansion in the operation.  Because of this, before discussing relevant factors to consider, we will briefly review the failure rates of new small businesses and why businesses fail.  Only 80 percent of small businesses survive the first year and only about 50 percent survive the five-year mark (U.S. Small Business Association, 2018).  CB Insights (2019) indicate that there are numerous reasons why small businesses fail.  Their top five reasons were as follows: lack of market need, not enough capital, not the right team, competition, and pricing.  These reasons are implicitly included in the discussion below

Strategic Options

Conventional planning typically assumes that managers can make projections using experience and predictions that remain relatively stable.  This approach works well when dealing with projects with limited uncertainty.  When dealing with new ventures and enterprises, assumptions made at the beginning of the project do not hold over time, resulting in needed adjustments to the original plan.  Discovery-driven planning offers a way to approach a project involving uncertainty (McGrath, 2013).  Discovery-driven planning frequently uses an “options” framework.  For example, a farm considered transitioning to organic crop production, may start by transitioning a relative a small proportion of their acreage.  Depending on how this experiment works out, the farm may either decrease or increase acreage converted to organic production.  More information pertaining to the evaluation of strategic options can be found in Langemeier and Boehlje (2017).

Impact on Current Operation

In addition to examining the impact of a new venture or enterprise on expected returns and risk, it is important to evaluate the strategic fit of the new activity.  Does the new venture or enterprise leverage the resource base of the farm (e.g., knowledge of operators) and is it consistent with the strategic direction of the business? For example, if a farm is examining the conversion of a portion of their acres to organic crop production, does it have the knowledge base to successfully produce each of the organic crops?  Organic crop production often involves more complex crop rotations, which may include small grain production and legumes. To control weeds, it is often necessary to extensively use rotary hoe and row cultivation operations, which requires the availability of additional labor during the growing season.

Two other aspects related to start-up challenges include managerial requirements, and ease of entry and exit. Langemeier and O’Donnell (2020) indicated that the differences in net returns for organic crop enterprises are much wider than those for conventional crop enterprises.  It is likely that part of this difference is due to the experience needed to successfully production organic crops.  It is also important to analyze the costs of entry and ease of exit when evaluating a new venture or enterprise.  The flexibility of selling the new venture or dropping the enterprise if it does not perform as expected or ends up not fitting with the rest of the business needs to be considered.  In particular, a farm needs to examine the challenges and costs encountered when exiting a venture or enterprise.  As an example, if a farm starts producing organic crops and then decides to drop these enterprises, it incurs the costs associated with the transition years, in which the farm had to use organic practices and sell the crops at conventional prices, as well as additional machinery costs related to investments that were need to produce the organic crops.

Start-Up Challenges

Langemeier and Boehlje (2018) examined the start-up challenges associated with farm growth.  This information is also relevant when evaluating a new venture or enterprise.  Farms that add a new venture or enterprise often run into cash flow shortages and deplete working capital in the early phases of the project.  Using pro-forma financial statements to gauge the size of these cash flow shortages is crucial.  Operational inefficiencies may also occur when adding a new venture or enterprise.  This is related to the learning curve, which is a curve depicting the relationship between per-unit cost and experience.  A steep learning curve would implies that per-unit cost differences decline rapidly with experience while a flatter learning curve implies that per-unit cost declines slowly with experience.  As noted above, there also may be management issues associated with the new venture or enterprise.  A few questions may help convey possible management challenges.  Has your management team allocated enough time for the new venture or enterprise?  What is important to make the new venture or enterprise work?  What are the constraints to making the new venture or enterprise work?

Going back to the example we have been using in this article, what are the start-up challenges associated with converting a portion of the farm’s acreage to organic crop production?  This may involve answering a series of questions such as the following.  What will it cost of to purchase the machinery and equipment needed to successfully produce organic crops?  Do we have sufficient labor and management time to make this conversion work?  On a related note, have we assigned at least one management person to this new venture?  How do the productions costs and yields of the proposed crops we are going to produce compare to those of crops we are currently producing?  Do we have buyers lined up for the organic crops we are planning to produce?  How will success be defined?

Concluding Thoughts

Several factors need to be considered when evaluating new ventures and enterprises.  Planning is more intense when a farm is examining a venture or enterprise that they are not very familiar with.  In addition to determining how a new venture or enterprise fits into the current operation, it is important to evaluate expected returns and risk, the cost and ease of entry and exit, and managerial requirements and complexity.  Finally, there may be start-up challenges such as cash flow shortages, operational inefficiencies, and managerial bottlenecks associated with a new venture or enterprise.

 


References

CB Insights.  “The Top 20 Reasons Startups Fail,” November 9, 2019.

Langemeier, M. and M. Boehlje.  “Evaluating Strategic Options.” Center for Commercial Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, July 2017.

Langemeier, M. and M. Boehlje.  “What are the Start-Up Challenges Associated with Farm Growth?”  Center for Commercial Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, April 2018.

Langemeier, M. and M. O’Donnell.  “Conventional and Organic Enterprise Net Returns.”  Center for Commercial Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, September 2020.

McGrath, R.  The End of Competitive Advantage.  Boston: Harvard Business Review, 2013.

U.S. Small Business Administration.  “Frequently Asked Questions about Small Businesses,” August 2018.

TAGS:

TEAM LINKS:

RELATED RESOURCES

Financial Stress on Crop Farms: Who Is Most at Risk in the 2024–26 Downturn?

September 3, 2025

Midwest crop producers have experienced a significant downturn in corn, soybean, and wheat prices since late 2023, resulting in a drop in net returns in 2024. Moreover, current expectations are that prices will continue to remain at or below the cost of production for at least a couple more years. Consequently, a key question being asked is as follows: “Who is the most vulnerable financially during this downturn”?

READ MORE

Factors Impacting Farm Growth

September 3, 2025

This article presents results from a recent survey pertaining to farm goals, and discusses the relationships between farm growth, farm goals, producer sentiment, and farm characteristics.

READ MORE

Adoption of Conservation Practices and Farm Goals

July 29, 2025

How do farm goals shape conservation decisions? This analysis draws on a nationwide survey of 400 producers to explore how priorities like profitability, risk, and sustainability impact the adoption of practices like no-till, cover crops, and crop diversification. Farmers who rank conservation as a top goal are significantly more likely to implement these practices—offering a window into what drives long-term thinking in farm management.

READ MORE

UPCOMING EVENTS

Purdue Flexible Lease Workshop

September 16 at 7 pm or September 23 at 9 am

The Flexible Lease virtual Workshop, presented by the Purdue Extension Land Lease Team, will include a presentation and discussion to help you decide if a flexible land lease arrangement is right for your farm.

Read More

2026 Crop Cost and Return Guide

September 16, 2025

The 2026 Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide provides estimated costs and net returns for planting, growing, and harvesting corn, soybeans, and wheat in the upcoming year. Cost and return information presents information for low, average, and high productivity soils. Early projections point to slightly higher breakeven prices.

READ MORE

2025 Farmland Values & Market Trends

September 9, 2025

Purdue ag economists Todd Kuethe and Michael Langemeier as they discuss Indiana farmland values on this, the first of two episodes reviewing the 2025 Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rental Rates survey results. The survey shows Indiana land prices continue to rise and are anticipated to continue a modest increase for the rest of 2025 for most of the state.

READ MORE

Farmland Prices Increase Despite Downward Pressure, Purdue Ag Econ Report August 2025

August 19, 2025

Indiana farmland prices have continued the trend of record highs in 2025, according to the latest Purdue Farmland Value and Cash Rents Survey results. The average price of top-quality farmland reached $14,826 per acre, a 3.0% increase from June 2024. Statewide, cash rents increased from 1.5 to 1.7% for poor-, average-, and top-quality land.

READ MORE